X-Men: Days of Future Past

Collector Freaks Forum

Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
But speculating is the fun part.

True, unless it contradicts with the established. At which point is becomes more of a concern.

This looks to be in the '70s timeline based on fashion of both individuals.

Beast is back to being normal which doesn't fit with the established XFC & X3 and is a pretty huge change.

Wolverine is with the 70s team which speculates to him being one of the time travellers.

Singer knows how offputting the contiunuity of the films is since he left the franchise so while these will probably make sense in the end, atm the question becomes... how?
 
True, unless it contradicts with the established. At which point is becomes more of a concern.

This looks to be in the '70s timeline based on fashion of both individuals.

Beast is back to being normal which doesn't fit with the established XFC & X3 and is a pretty huge change.

Wolverine is with the 70s team which speculates to him being one of the time travellers.

Singer knows how offputting the contiunuity of the films is since he left the franchise so while these will probably make sense in the end, atm the question becomes... how?

Why you ruining the movie for Biojex, let him speculate dammit. :lol
 
I love X1, X2, & XFC.

I'm not one for continuity compaining, if the movie is good i'll enjoy it.

I generally have faith in Singer, as the best of the X-Movies are with him involved, but pics like these shoot himself and the movie in the foot as they highlight inconsistenecies which raise negative opinion and unanswerable questions,
 
Well.. at least he is being series consistant.

Each film has had major continuity erros so far, why stop now? :lol

Hopefully, by the end of Days of future past... we will have a timeline that makes sense, and have everything work in a logical manner.
 
Brian singer appears to have lost his touch. He hasn't made a good movie in a while. Look at the movies he has made since 2006; he is regressing with his films. I have given singer plenty of chances to redeem himself but its been one let down after another (superman returns, valkerie, and most recently ****ing obi wan Kenobi and the beanstalks). Not sure what happened to him but he is falling off the deep end. He started off so well with usual suspects and xmen movies and then each movie thereafter got progressively worse. Early success must have went to his head, and he can no longer see his flaws and assumes everything he puts out will be full of win. He is also a media whore always wanting attention, which is why he still comments about superman and the new man of steel movie. If I was him I wouldn't want to remind people of my association with that film, but to him it was a masterpiece and he is till proud of it. Not sure what world he lives in???
 
Haven't seen Jack the Giant Killer. Is it really bad or just usual haters hating?

Its not bad I liked it a good movie I preferred it over OZ and I think if it opened at a later date it would have done better, a common complaint is that the giants did not look like humans and were far to CGI for some peoples tastes I thought they looked fine nothing like a low budget TV movie or anything
 
Singer's last decent film was Apt. Pupil. Everything he's made since has been agenda-driven crap.

Apt pupil was a good movie. I think agenda driven is a good analogy.

With the xmen movies he connected personally with the material and used the mutants plight and struggles to be accepted by humans as a metaphor for his own homosexual struggles to be accepted by society. The mutants were gays, and the humans were a society that refused to accept them for who they are. They fear the unknown and try rid the world of these mutants/gays via persecution.

He did this with superman too. The movie is riddled with themes of isolation and loneliness such as having him fly off and cry after hearing what Lois says,, having supes peep on Lois with Richard, her son and family- showing a Yearning for acceptance and to have a family life with children. Looking at "the family" as an outsider, something maybe he himself, like supes, can never have

The themes are fine, the problem is he places too much importance on them and needs to find more subtle ways to add them in. With superman, he could have had scenes that show his isolation but didn't need it to be so in your face about it. Yes superman is isolated but peeping on families and crying over Lois was not the best way too show this
 
Last edited:
The theme is part of the story, placing importance on them goes hand in hand with the movie. :dunno

The theme of persecution & acceptance in society is universal for race, sexuality, species, culture, religion & nationality.

It's a relatable theme to many people. It's what makes X-Men so great.

Since none of his X-Men movies had forced gay characters or same sex kissing i don't see how his sexuality is a factor.

And if he did have Northstar as a character with a boyfriend i still don't see the problem since being Gay is part of modern enlightened society.

EDIT: Not calling you a Gay basher or anything Skywalker, just relating my view :1-1:
 
Last edited:
Back
Top