Michael Crawford
Super Freak
- Joined
- Sep 11, 2005
- Messages
- 5,233
- Reaction score
- 45
I'll be picking up Predator at Best Buy tomorrow for $15. Isn't there also supposed to be a $10 off Predators admission in there?
Me too, and I work in video and effects so I don't see a problem with removing noise from film as long as it doesn't remove details, which this doesn't. Noise can make things look more realistic, but if it's already real then it's not an issue. Plus things only looked more realistic with film grain because up to now you couldn't avoid it.
Did anyone pick up the Last Airbender Book 1 released a week or so ago? Do they have the pop up versions of the shows on there? I'm betting not...
Absolutely. I think it's funny - and a bit sad - that some folks are placing themselves above the so called unwashed film masses by acting like grain is a good thing. It never is. It doesn't improve a picture.
Now, I will agree that if it was the INTENTION of the filmmaker for it to be grainy for effect, then the restored version should likewise have said grain. A great example is Saving Private Ryan.
However, that's only true in a very small percentage of movies. Grain is an outcome of film, film processing, and light levels during shooting. Film makers would not have it if they could, so acting as though removing it when possible is some sort of blasphemy only hurts the general opinion of self appointed purists. It is true that the overuse of DNR CAN hurt the look of a film - Lord of the Rings is a fine example - but I'm not seeing it with Predator.
And the film grain is preserved, so they still look like movies should look.
Just got these 5 DVD's for €10
Nice bud
Watched Seraphin Falls a few months back, came across it by chance when it was on TV! Was pretty good film to watch, better than expected, especially for something like 1 am that you stumble across falling ass first into something
Please tell me Fox won't DNR the hell out of the Alien films.
Enter your email address to join: