InArt - The Batman 1/6th Figure

Hologram AI said:

The skin detail and the eyes looks to be really nicely done. Great improvement in those areas since they've done Joker.

Photos by Jose G.

Click to expand...

These sculpts are looking great. It's the biggest thing I'm concerned about. I'll be doing the inspection tomorrow, but I'm eager to take a quick glance at the sculpt before bed.

Scout Trooper said:

These sculpts are looking great. It's the biggest thing I'm concerned about. I'll be doing the inspection tomorrow, but I'm eager to take a quick glance at the sculpt before bed.

Click to expand...

I wouldn't be concerned, it's fantastic.

chrisstbh said:

I wouldn't be concerned, it's fantastic.

Click to expand...

Some aren't as good as others
Plus, there's already been cases of paint rubs, and dye stains.

Scout Trooper said:

Some aren't as good as othersView attachment 713378
Plus, there's already been cases of paint rubs, and dye stains.

Click to expand...

I don’t see anything wrong with that one

Scout Trooper said:

Some aren't as good as othersView attachment 713378
Plus, there's already been cases of paint rubs, and dye stains.

Click to expand...

He go for a blow dry straight out the box?
That plastic over the head in the box certainly kept the hair tight to the head on mine.

chrisstbh said:

I don’t see anything wrong with that one

Click to expand...

Look at the frizzy hair. Looks like he has a bob too.

Doesn't look like anything some water futzing won't fix. Was the same for Gandalf. Big difference between those who slapped the sculpt on the figure straight out of the container and those who water treated it a bit.

HyperDrive said:

Look at the frizzy hair. Looks like he has a bob too.

Click to expand...

Looks fine to me. Maybe slightly more volume.

I wouldn't trust collectors who screw up removing the head then post bad photos. They also like to toss firecrackers into crowds to see reactions.

Some moron just bought OT’s extra inart figure for a whopping 1500. Standard by the way.

Nine Inch Nails said:

Some moron just bought OT’s extra inart figure for a whopping 1500. Standard by the way.

Click to expand...

What the ****?!

Nine Inch Nails said:

Some moron just bought OT’s extra inart figure for a whopping 1500. Standard by the way.

Click to expand...

No way...

My only concern is that the hair stays or improves for second batch. And I really hope the skin details remain or doesn’t get washed out.

Also why would anyone buy from OT, literally so many other options on Ebay that sell inart at a much lower price point.. They definitely have money to burn.

potatocorner4life said:

My only concern is that the hair stays or improves for second batch. And I really hope the skin details remain or doesn’t get washed out.

Also why would anyone buy from OT, literally so many other options on Ebay that sell inart at a much lower price point.. They definitely have money to burn.

Click to expand...

Might be wrong but surely he did some modifications to it otherwise… what on earth?!

Nine Inch Nails said:

Some moron just bought OT’s extra inart figure for a whopping 1500. Standard by the way.

Click to expand...

aksimpson123 said:

Might be wrong but surely he did some modifications to it otherwise… what on earth?!

Click to expand...

Nope. Box fresh unopened standard edition.

You can add highway robbery to the list of reasons not to like OT lol

Darn, I would have sold my second premium to them for $1450

Raleig.h said:

You can add highway robbery to the list of reasons not to like OT lol

Click to expand...

That’s more so on the sucker who bought it from him lol. But I get it, Oaty has a bad rep, but I love his Begins cowl.

lordnastrond said:

Phone is finally working again!
Here are my truly amateur pics - the figure is awesome and trust me it looks a lot better in person than I can make it look with my ancient phone's camera
View attachment 713317View attachment 713316View attachment 713318View attachment 713320
View attachment 713319View attachment 713321View attachment 713322

View attachment 713325

View attachment 713329
View attachment 713331View attachment 713333

Click to expand...

I don’t know what type of ancient phone you’ve got but perhaps it’s the absence of lens distortion and all the automatic refinements more modern phones make but you’ve captured what looks like a very naturalistic and ‘honest’ take of what I imagine this will look like in hand… with a little less clarity than my own eyes will provide.