Hot Toys MMS 692 + 693 BATMAN (1989) 1/6 scale Batman 2.0

batfan08 said:

Awesome, thank you! Did you get the “thank you for voting” thing, too? I was gonna try to ask about Jack and see if they have any plans to do DC Comics figures under the Hoño Studios banner…

Click to expand...

I was able to submit a question when it first went up. I'm guessing they will be doing the interview soon so they're no longer taking questions.

Probably looking at the final product here on display today, although the lighting is horrible so hard to form an accurate opinion on the face.

Spanbauer said:

Probably looking at the final product here on display today, although the lighting is horrible so hard to form an accurate opinion on the face.

Click to expand...

Why would they use the worst lower face plate

The suit seems way too matte and textured.

It’s like they wanted to mix standard and BD look…



The original suit is more glossy and sleek IMO

They nailed it on DX09.


The new sculpt… hard to say with this light but still not sold…
The base is fantastic though!

That cheeseball smile with a bloody face looks silly.

We will need a new cape for sure, that one doesn't look look good.

I still wouldn't be too worried. WB100 Wonder Woman looked just as bad as this recent video of this '89 Batman 2.0 the last time we saw her before she started shipping and reviews started coming in. She looked great once she was in collectors' hands.

On Display:

Officially released:


So, I won't be getting razzled until it's actually released

If that’s the final body, money saved…

What, you don't like Dol Gadot?

Rondesmo said:

The suit seems way too matte and textured.

It’s like they wanted to mix standard and BD look…
View attachment 715617
View attachment 715618

Click to expand...

That's a strange pose to have chosen - the way the rubber crotch has crumpled in weirdly and the knee armour riding up above the joint, it's really not very flattering.

Wor-Gar said:

What, you don't like Dol Gadot?

Click to expand...

Oh, she actually looks pretty good. I was referring to the above video of ‘89 Bats and his rubber onesie. Probably should’ve quoted it…

batfan08 said:

Oh, she actually looks pretty good. I was referring to the above video of ‘89 Bats and his rubber onesie. Probably should’ve quoted it…

Click to expand...

ha sorry. Wasn't trying to cause confusion. Just trying to show how bad WB100 WW looked right before she shipped compared to how good she looked when actually released. Thinking/hoping it's the same case for this 89 Batman 2.0

Body texture is the same as the DX09 its just the lighting making you think differently

Debating cancelling this not impressed by the suit at all. DX09 looks better correct me if I'm wrong but the proto suit wasn't like that?

It's the harsh lighting washing everything out. That is a terrible picture to base judgment of quality on. From the pose, to the mouth piece to the awful lighting conditions.

But that mouth piece definitely sucks.

Are we at the 'regret pre-ordering and panic over a badly lit proto pic' stage?

I don't see the point of cancelling right now anyway. Might as well wait at least until the actual production pics are out to decide. Deciding off that badly taken and lit photo isn't the smartest way to be making a decision unless you're actually looking for a reason to cancel.

I'll hold off until we see an unboxing then make judgement, maybe a bit rash.

right to say the pic is not flattering.
On other shots it looks good.
But still think the cape doesn’t match with the cowl and suit.