EXO-6 Star Trek "Discovery" figures

Advertise with us
shop deals on amazon
Shop deals on ebay
Collector Freaks Forum

Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
QuiGonFishing said:
I LOVED Discovery! But even I have to agree with some of those points. I found the serialized plot captivating at least through season 2, but of a dip in season 3, recapturing some of the magic in season 4.

The issue I have with Discovery haters is that most of the criticism seems to flow from the idea that the show doesn't resemble the other ST iterations we love so well enough for them. I think that's a weak charge.

The show is admittedly very focused on Burnham's personal journey and that focus definitely takes the ensemble rapport of the bridge crew feature down a peg or two, but there was still plenty of that for me with Saru and Burnham, Stamets and Culber, Jett Reno with EVERYONE, lol! (you can look up who that is, @StarDude), Tilly coming of age and finding herself, Detmer sitting at her station looking sexy....

Yes, it's different, but different isn't necessarily bad. People also had a big problem with inventing a sister for Spock, and I was as skeptical about that as anyone. But I thought it worked very well. Their dynamic made perfect sense, and seeing them work through their relationship was an interesting and worthy change of pace, and I didn't feel that it diminished the character of Spock in any way. If anything it fleshed him out that much more.

Bottom line in my view is that if you came into the show thinking "Ok, let's see what WOKE trash Kutrzman is going to push on us this week", then yeah, you're going to find a way to dislike everything you see. But even coming from a decidedly more conservative vantage point, I loved it.
Click to expand...

I agree with just about all of that. I loved Disco's first season. I didn't mind the whole "Spock's sister" thing until they started in later seasons to treat it like he owed all of who he was to Burnham, which was over the top.
But in general, I checked out as soon as Kovich told Stamets he'd transfer Stamets if he couldn't trust Zora. I thought Stamets was absolutely right in his concerns, Zora had already demonstrated multiple times she was emotionally unstable, and the whole resolution to that infuriated me.
But I blame most of that on Michelle Paradise, whom I think tanked the show when she took over.
I still love Discovery, though. I think that's why the things that bother me infuriate me so much.
 
DParga21 said:
I agree with just about all of that. I loved Disco's first season. I didn't mind the whole "Spock's sister" thing until they started in later seasons to treat it like he owed all of who he was to Burnham, which was over the top.
But in general, I checked out as soon as Kovich told Stamets he'd transfer Stamets if he couldn't trust Zora. I thought Stamets was absolutely right in his concerns, Zora had already demonstrated multiple times she was emotionally unstable, and the whole resolution to that infuriated me.
But I blame most of that on Michelle Paradise, whom I think tanked the show when she took over.
I still love Discovery, though. I think that's why the things that bother me infuriate me so much.
Click to expand...

Well said! I forgot about that part and wholeheartedly agree with your feelings here. Not everything worked, and there are moments when it seemed like they were pushing an agenda that a producer/writer du jour brought to the table. But I found just about all of those details fairly minor and forgettable (clearly, lol!).
 
StarDude said:
I'll say it. Discovery sucks.
The bridge crew? What bridge crew? Those people with like 2 lines total that nobody remembers the name of? With absolutely zero character development or character?

They killed that blue robot lady and treated it as a big deal but we had never actually properly got to know her.
Micheal was going "I love you guys!" to bridge crew no body formed a connection with and few can remember their names. Because the literally pretty much do nothing.

If Michael and Saru have trouble selling to justify them, the rest of the "who the fudge are they?" crew would sell about 5 each.


Strange New Worlds improves this and has characters with character! I know their NAMES of all things. They each get EPISODES! They are not IGNORED!
Pike was one of the few good things to come out of the show. I kind of liked Lorca but he's gone. Some characters are decent but let's not pretend that bridge crew isn't the focus of the show and is good. The show focuses elsewhere.
View attachment 694337

I literally can't name many of them because they're so irrelevant.
Airam or something is the dumb blue person who we never formed a connection with and were somehow supposed to care died.
Detmer? Her character is she got injured and blamed Michael and is now over it. That's it.

Uuurghhh don't remember the other names of all the one line people... Ignoring the actual main characters like Stamets, the doc who ain't here. That dumb cat (geeze). Etc.

If some of those basically nameless characters get made, it's because Nanjin is being nice and deciding he doesn't some money. Maybe all of them if the ratings rumors for Discovery are true.... Seems for the later seasons someone at Paramount decided money wasn't important when not cancelling the show earlier :p. Probably due to it's ties to Paramount +.
Click to expand...
Tell us how you REALLY feel. 😁

If you're not a fan of the show that's fine, but they stated at the beginning that this was meant to be less of an ensemble show and focused much more on Burnham's character and journey. And while the bridge crew are mostly undeveloped we've still gotten to know quite a few other characters over the 4 seasons (Saru, Stamets, Tilly, Culber, Adira, Book, Tyler, Georgiou). And there are plenty of episodes where Burnham isn't the central focus at all.

So it just seems weird to me that the metric of whether a Trek show is good or not is whether the bridge crew are fully developed or not. Hell we didn't learn much about the other TOS crew until the movies 15 years later! They were mostly just glorified extras until then.
 
Last edited:
davejames said:
Tell us how you REALLY feel. 😁

If you're not a fan of the show that's fine, but they stated at the beginning that this was meant to be less of an ensemble show and focused much more on Burnham's character and journey. And while the bridge crew are mostly undeveloped we've still gotten to know quite a few other characters over the 4 seasons (Saru, Stamets, Tilly, Culber, Adira, Book, Tyler, Georgiou). And there are plenty of episodes where Burnham isn't the central focus at all.
Click to expand...

Agreed. We've had lots of well-developed characters. Just, not the bridge crew. Which is annoying to me, but I think Discovery's contributions to the Canon have been a net positive in general.

QuiGonFishing said:
Well said! I forgot about that part and wholeheartedly agree with your feelings here. Not everything worked, and there are moments when it seemed like they were pushing an agenda that a producer/writer du jour brought to the table. But I found just about all of those details fairly minor and forgettable (clearly, lol!).
Click to expand...

I didn't think the agenda-pushing got to be too much until the whole Adira/Gray thing. It seemed so obvious to me that Gray especially was only there so the producers could virtue signal. Add to that Adira only became non- binary when their actor came out as non-binary, and it just reeks of pandering. Which is the same reason I hated them making Sulu gay in Beyond (A sentiment Tajei agreed with).
SNW has the right idea with Jessie Keitel. Just call her "they" and let everyone be nonchalant. No need to hang a big sign on it. This why I look forward to seeing Keitel's character again, but am actively hoping Gray is no where to be seen in Season 5.
 
DParga21 said:
I didn't think the agenda-pushing got to be too much until the whole Adira/Gray thing. It seemed so obvious to me that Gray especially was only there so the producers could virtue signal. Add to that Adira only became non- binary when their actor came out as non-binary, and it just reeks of pandering. Which is the same reason I hated them making Sulu gay in Beyond (A sentiment Tajei agreed with).
SNW has the right idea with Jessie Keitel. Just call her "they" and let everyone be nonchalant. No need to hang a big sign on it. This why I look forward to seeing Keitel's character again, but am actively hoping Gray is no where to be seen in Season 5.
Click to expand...
Eh I never thought the characters entirely worked, but not because of the non-binary thing, but just because they were dull characters. And I never got the sense the show was "pushing" anything or making a big deal about it, aside I guess from a couple references to the discrimination the characters face. But given how real and pervasive that is in our society right now, it would be extremely odd for a Trek series to not address that at some point. Since that's kinda what Trek is supposed to do.
 
davejames said:
Eh I never thought the characters entirely worked, but not because of the non-binary thing, but just because they were dull characters. And I never got the sense the show was "pushing" anything or making a big deal about it, aside I guess from a couple references to the discrimination the characters face. But given how real and pervasive that is in our society right now, it would be extremely odd for a Trek series to not address that at some point. Since that's kinda what Trek is supposed to do.
Click to expand...
Yes, absolutely that's what Trek does.
My complaint is exactly what you said: The characters are boring and only seem to exist because of what the actors are.
To me, it's like the difference between Melora on DS9 (which was dogcrap) and Aurellio on DSC (which was great).
Gray is exactly what his name implies: Bland and boring and useless. The fact that they basically wrote him off the show after, what, five whole episodes seemed to indicate they either never intended to use him much or they just gave up. They got their magazine cover out of it and that was all they wanted
Which really undercuts what the whole message of having a character like that is supposed to be, anyway.
 
I’m preparing to make a recommendation for the next Discovery figure (if any) to be announced. But before I do, I’d like to give my good friends on this Forum a chance to see if they can GUESS what my recommendation might be!

Let’s face it, this thread has been dead for quite some time, so let’s see if we can resuscitate it for a while.

Hints:

1. Not necessarily a main character.

2. No one I’ve mentioned before.

GO!
 
QuiGonFishing said:
I’m preparing to make a recommendation for the next Discovery figure (if any) to be announced. But before I do, I’d like to give my good friends on this Forum a chance to see if they can GUESS what my recommendation might be!

Let’s face it, this thread has been dead for quite some time, so let’s see if we can resuscitate it for a while.

Hints:

1. Not necessarily a main character.

2. No one I’ve mentioned before.

GO!
Click to expand...
Whoever it is, I'm sure you've found a sexy picture of her to share. 😁
 
I know Nanjin loves this show, but he's gonna lose money making the rest of these characters
 
Sarge said:
I know Nanjin loves this show, but he's gonna lose money making the rest of these characters
Click to expand...

I don't think so. The Nielsons for it were high.
It spawned three spinoffs.
It lasted five seasons.
And people are already VERY excited for Georgiou.
I think he could make money on figures of, say, Culber, Stamets, Tilly, Book, and possibly Vance as well. Maybe Jet Reno. I'd also gladly get a L'Rell and Voq / Tyler.
Edit:
And Lorca, freaking duh. I love Lorca.
 
I think the only others being seriously considered were Captain Georgiou, Emperor Georgiou, and Pike. Which would probably sell better than Burnham and Saru given the popularity of the actors and/or characters.
 
DParga21 said:
I don't think so. The Nielsons for it were high.
It spawned three spinoffs.
It lasted five seasons.
Click to expand...
That doesn’t necessarily equate to merchandise sales, two different animals. We’ll never really know the sales numbers but what we do see is EXO still having Burnham and Saru in stock (and they were released ages ago). If your two main characters are still in inventory, it’s highly likely the secondary characters you mentioned will move extremely slowly as well, thus increasing his holding and warehousing costs. It’s unlikely they would be running production lots at the same scale as TOS or TNG either, so he has fewer units to spread his costs. Based on this, Sarge is likely correct.
 
Last edited:
Skyroes speaks true. High ratings do not mean high sales in merchandise. Trekkies tend to be frugal with their purchases. More so than other franchises I’ve seen. I remember non 1/6 Trekkie collectors balking at the prices of Exo figures when they were under 200. The 600 TOMY TOS Enterprise had a lot of “to expensive “ comments too.

IMO the fan base was spoiled by Playmates.

If Exo6 made more DISCO figs I think Lorca, and Book would sell enough to be profitable or at least break even. Maybe Staments, and Culper. The rest…while I would get them cause I’m getting everything Exo6 makes, I don’t think they would sell well.
 
I don't think Discovery is going to get many more figures beyond the Yeoh characters. I'd like to see a Captain Burnham, but I think the only shot that figure has of being made is if Nanjin really wants to commit to having every uniform in 1/6 scale.

The show just didn't do a good job of getting people to invest in characters that weren't Saru, Burnham, Stamets, and Culber.
 

Similar threads

S
Hello :)
Replies
3
Views
230
Darth Snoopy
Darth Snoopy
B
For Sale Star Trek/Star Wars Items - BORG Collection - Bonus Kirk - Other Items Incoming
Replies
1
Views
204
BojTrek
B
Vanguard1138
EXO-6 Star Trek "Strange New Worlds" Figures
12 13 14
Replies
273
Views
27K
davejames
davejames
Vanguard1138
EXO-6 Star Trek “Picard” Figures
15 16 17
Replies
333
Views
35K
Kebron
K
Silenthillz
Is Aliexpress reliable?
Replies
15
Views
3K
screamingmetal
screamingmetal

Latest posts

Back
Top