- Joined
- May 4, 2015
- Messages
- 3,411
- Reaction score
- 3,866
Honestly what’s the point of this “Justin inspired” curl? I liked it sculpted more
InArt: 1/6 Superman (Cavill)
- Thread starter Nagoya
- Start date
Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:
- Joined
- May 4, 2015
- Messages
- 3,411
- Reaction score
- 3,866
Personally I don’t like mixed media especially on the hair. But curl is so small I can ignore it lolCant please everyone I guess
I actually like the curl
Dean Knight shared photo under the natural lighting. Looks way better
The curl is iconic Superman. And his hair was like that, albeit briefly during their fight.
- Joined
- May 4, 2015
- Messages
- 3,411
- Reaction score
- 3,866
Curl is iconic but not glued on one, it could easily be sculpted. Looks like sculpted anyway. I hope transition is seamless in person.
It's kinda funny how much this sculpt reminds me of the OSK sculpt. Which is either a testament to how good that OSK sculpt was, or how much softer the Inart one looks now...
- Joined
- May 4, 2015
- Messages
- 3,411
- Reaction score
- 3,866
OSK sculpt is great, it doesn’t photograph well bc of softer paint but in person it looks truly good. There are bootlegs everywhere and ppl are mistaken all the time when they don’t give credit to the original release.
OSK sculpt was definitely even softer than what we got here.
People mistaking bokeh and camera focusing with sculpt softness....
Heard the same exact thing in the Aragorn threads...
People never learn
Heard the same exact thing in the Aragorn threads...
People never learn
Sculpt softness aside, a lot of realism was lost on the hair and eyebrows due to paint difference.
Perfect
Urrgghhh, that collar piece extending out onto the delts unlike the proto. 
Mr.Tanker
Super Freak
- Joined
- Mar 4, 2006
- Messages
- 1,808
- Reaction score
- 1,084
The smaller something is, the harder it can be to get it really sharp in focus, unless you are shooting with your aperture closed all the way down.
The prototype looks so much sharper, partially because that is just the nature of prototypes, but the promotional photo is also in perfect focus.
The production shot on the right here is not completely in focus, and some of the "softness" of the sculpt is honestly just coming from that.
That being said, I think the production figure looks great.
Urrgghhh, that collar piece extending out onto the delts unlike the proto.
I think the cape just needs to be futz out more to cover it up. Here's Dean's photo on the left.
I hope so, although I still think it flares out too much. I see people here talking about soft sculpts and speckled paint, while I'm wincing at how bad the cape still looks. We were so close to greatness. It's still better than HT attempt though.
Justin's suggestions have been nothing but crap honestly.
Justin also suggested the track system on the magnetic bases that still can't hold a figure.
Meanwhile, they ignored all our suggestions that would have made a much improved figure.
- Joined
- May 4, 2015
- Messages
- 3,411
- Reaction score
- 3,866
You can’t prove that here, ppl are either blinded by excitement or acting dumb on purpose. Most of them saying they can’t see any difference. Personally I stopped arguing. Sculpt looks great but it doesn’t look as great as it used to and when I pay 400$ “mass production softening” can’t be an excuse. When InArt stepped in they promised “next level” realism. I don’t see it here. Their figures are great but I don’t see any reason them costing two times more than hot toys. Hope in person I’ll be blown away and I’m just complaining for no reason.
Yep
Last edited:
Mogli
Super Freak
- Joined
- Dec 10, 2012
- Messages
- 1,261
- Reaction score
- 517
It looks good there, much better than the first look we got the other day. The sculpt softness looks similar to Aragorn, but he just had a beard to add extra detail so it's more obvious with Superman I think. I wonder if us regular customers can actually expect to get this before 2025?
