My only hope for this is that they read the books. Over and over. Go back to the source material, and set Bond back where he belongs - 1953 to the mid 1960s. James Bond was shaped by WWII and is active during the Cold War, an exciting and eminently cinematic era, so set them in his era!
Making Bond relevant, or fit for modern audiences, is not doing the character - or Ian Fleming's legacy - any justice. I don't want a female head of the service, I don't want Moneypenny being more than a functionary, I don't want Q being camp and amusing - Bond was operating in a dangerous world and was a dangerous man. I pray to all the gods that whoever runs with this abandons the woeful attempts to modernise Bond that the Broccoli/Wilson films this century have foisted upon lovers of the books, character and early films. Fleming worked in Naval Intelligence - this was a man who knew the murky world of espionage and the dangers it posed, and he created Bond to reflect that.
Setting it in its period also gets rid of the reliance on tech and gadgets - nothing is more boring than seeing more and more outrageous electronic warfare that reduces the plot to a silly game of one-upmanship.
For those who say Bond is anachronistic, yes, he is! That's the whole point. Set him in his own time, and stop trying to mould him into something he was never meant to be.