Yeah I'm sure that's just a combination of bad lighting and a bad camera phone. The coloring in the previous page's pics looked much more subtle and natural.
....Sheesh if that camera get any closer you will see he is also missing nose hairs.
Camera is so close his head is warped lol
Will look fine from a normal distance.
More likely someone Photoshopping it just to get a reaction here Id say.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
yeah I photoshopped it to get ur precious reaction [emoji276]
This is the video:
https://www.instagram.com/tv/CGQr7wtBhMN/?igshid=q0kqbwgzp21d
yeah I photoshopped it to get ur precious reaction [emoji276]
This is the video:
https://www.instagram.com/tv/CGQr7wtBhMN/?igshid=q0kqbwgzp21d
Thanks for the link.
You can hear she's doing this review while talking through her mask. LOL!
What's there to laugh?
She's by herself. Take it off for the 2 minute review. Put it back on.
I'm pretty sure here guys that even if you took the prototype and put it under artificial bright white lights it would also look washed out the way the production version does. My gripe thus far is the excessive pink around the eyes and especially the cheeks. Again, the pink issue i'm sure looks far less intrusive under natural lighting.
My only other minor gripe is the child seems to have angled his gaze more upward than the prototype. This may be angle of photo or the fact they have him displayed on a tall pedestal, but the prototype seemed to only slightly look up...opinions?
Lighting is everything people. I reserve my final judgement when someone can show a photo in regular lighting. The Hot Toys was a write off for me as i greatly dislike the open mouth as it makes for a less desirable pose. The Sideshow facial expression is much cuter and in line with what i would expect. I also couldn't get past the seams on the ears.....
If those new pics are based on an actual production sample, I'm SO happy...
Enter your email address to join: