1/4 Scale Frodo!!!

Collector Freaks Forum

Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Hells of Iron said:
From chat log:

Brant, was the Lee's magazine image a very old picture!?!?

Lee's magazine pic is old, but not dramatically different.

Good! I'm really liking this piece as is and wouldn't want it to change dramatically. I love the way he's creeping tensely down some Moria steps - gives a real sense of tension IMHO. Much, much better (I think) than the Weta version, more alive. :cool:
 
It looks ok, nothing great, probably not worth the PF price. I'm not liking the base at all either, but will have to wait for more pictures.
 
KrisSolo said:
I love the way he's creeping tensely down some Moria steps - gives a real sense of tension IMHO. Much, much better (I think) than the Weta version, more alive.

Seretur said:
It's not from a Frodo-centric part of the movies (why not do a TTT or ROTK Frodo?), and it seems to be trying to capture the stealth and wariness of the hobbits, but ends up doing too much for its own good.

I understand about the tension and agree with you, and that it does have a lot of life to the pose. But there is something I don't like about it and I think Seretur may have said what I'm feeling.

I would have been happy with a simple Shire Frodo myself.
 
I just don't get using real cloth. Sure, it's authentic, but it still never looks like it does in the film. Plus real cloth always makes the head seem way small. Sculpted cloting will always win in my book, unless it's armour like Lurtz.
 
One thing that I like with this piece is the pose. It's kind of dramatic and action like something I know lots of people complained about with the SSW pieces. I think one of the changes may be the head position based on all the different banners you can choose from that we've seen mashed together. The only thing I'm still having some issues with is how the coat looks but I think that's another thing they probably have fixed.
 
Robo, I understand your argument about the swords, but why would Sting be the same size as an Uruk scimitar? If any one thing is going to be consistent from PF statue to PF statue, it will probably be the base height (not that this is the case with SS/W statues, but with only two pieces in the SS PF line, it's a slightly safer bet). Or am I not getting something?

:)
 
They have said that with PFs they are trying harder to be in scale. I believe Frodo's base is the same height as Lurtz's, so you can adjust your scaling accordingly. Most likely the picture of Lurtz in Lee's was not level with Frodo.
 
Darklord Dave said:
They have said that with PFs they are trying harder to be in scale.

That's excellent news.:banana

I think it's important for the scale to be correct when all of the 1/4's are displayed together. It will be cool that you can accurately compare Lurtz to Vader or Gandalf to Obi-Wan.
 
Again, looks nothing like Elijah from the pic posted but i'm going to wait for official pics for final judgement.Still looks better than the weta version though which IS terrible IMO.Before you lambast me...I like it because of the pose,base and clothing at the mo.
 
It seems like posting this picture got people moving in a hundred different directions! While Robodad did a fantastic job of scaling Lurtz to the Frodo, I think the original photo as it appeared in Lee's were not of two items next to each other, but two seperate photos, as they were not scaled to reference one another. While a have a few minor gripes with the new format of Frodo, if this albeit crummy picture even remotely resembles the finished product, I will be ecstatic.

I like that Frodo is depicted in a dangerous situation, somewhat fearful but sword in hand. I think that nicely captures his journey throughout the films as well. Let Sam or Pippin capture the more sedate hobbity lifestyle in their Premium Format figure, as I think they are more representative of the Shire as characters anyway. Frodo, being a Baggins, is drawn to excitement and adventure, just like his uncle Bilbo!

I do think that this piece, like Lurtz and Aragorn, could use a little more weathering on the costume, but I like that Frodo has his green travel cloak, and his backpack as well. Frodo's foot fur is a little too neatly trimmed for my taste as well, but overall I am really in love with this version. In my opinion, this captures Frodo and Elijah Wood's likeness much better than the Weta statue.
 
Well, today I had a chance to go pick up this magazine and I'd have to say getting a chance to look at the pic right on it looks even better than I thought. I know it's not the best pic in the world but if this is what the final one looks like I will be so happy with it :)

They also had a Lee's Toy Review Price Guide that has the SSW stuff listed and SS SW 12" and 1/4 figures listed and what they say they are worth. I bought that for giggles.
 
Re: 1/4 Scale Harry Frodo!!!

It's kind of dramatic and action like something I know lots of people complained about with the SSW pieces

With all the action in the movies I think frodo and sam got the least.
Frodo for the most part holds the ring and battles in himself which the weta statue captures well. I think the only time sting slays an orc is in the hands of sam and the only real action frodo has (apart from being stabbed by the witch king and that lovely cave troll) is with shelob and all thats more running away than real fighting.

The best action pose for a weathered and worn frodo would probably be with sting in one hand and the Phial of Galadriel in the other faced with shelob.
 
I just think it's a nice change to have him in a little more of a dramatic pose. I know he didn't exactly go Rambo on anyone but he isn't doing that with this pose either. It's just more dramatic and action oriented than the SSW piece is all.
 
Seretur said:
Robo, I understand your argument about the swords, but why would Sting be the same size as an Uruk scimitar? If any one thing is going to be consistent from PF statue to PF statue, it will probably be the base height (not that this is the case with SS/W statues, but with only two pieces in the SS PF line, it's a slightly safer bet). Or am I not getting something?

:)
I know exactly what you mean. Assuming you are right, and the base heights should be the same, then here is a new comparison pic:

lurtzfrodo27ka.jpg


I don't know which one is right, but both make for interesting discussion, don't they? ;)
 
Actually that's a bit TOO small now...

Hopefully they'll post a comparison pic when he goes up like they did with the new Marvel Vs.
 
Darklord Dave said:
Actually that's a bit TOO small now...

Hopefully they'll post a comparison pic when he goes up like they did with the new Marvel Vs.
Not really....Hobbits are around 3'6...and Uruks were supposed to stand upwards of 7'. (...even though they didn't in the films....But still, even at their 6'2 - 6'7 height) :cool:

Looks closer now than before!
 
Darklord Dave said:
Actually that's a bit TOO small now...

Hopefully they'll post a comparison pic when he goes up like they did with the new Marvel Vs.
Well, Frodo does look too small in this pic (to me), but the bases are exactly the same height. But as you say, it would be great if they could eliminate the confusion when he goes up for order.
 
That pic looks about right to me and not too small.Think of the Uruk's carrying Pippin and Merry in the TT- they are tiny in comparison.
 
Back
Top