1/6 1/6 DIECAST Iron Man 2 WAR MACHINE

Collector Freaks Forum

Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
I don't think you can do that because it looks like the eyes themselves are a deep red.

It's kind of a bummer. I thought that this would be one of the improved aspects of the figure.

My sentiments as well. Not a make or break deal but definitely a disappointment.
 
Personally I don't think they look that bad. In hand with new batteries they will probably be brighter than some of the photos show (they have been tweaked etc), and some of the shots in the movie show them darker red than others. I doubt it will bother me at all :)
 
My sentiments as well. Not a make or break deal but definitely a disappointment.

I totally agree.

In the movie the eyes were so bright that you could only tell they were red around the edges. A tint of red would've been nice, or perhaps just a red outline on the eyes would've worked better.
 
I don't think you can do that because it looks like the eyes themselves are a deep red.

It's kind of a bummer. I thought that this would be one of the improved aspects of the figure.

idk, I think that only the leds are red:

14370340_1048370055283982_55777528272119686_n.jpg
 
Couldn't resist. Bought mine now on ebay, maybe next week I receive and I'll take some photos for you
 
Is the scale on this new WM off? I saw a pic from someone in HK (cant find it anymore) showing a side by side comparison of the new WM against the diecast IM MK3, and it makes the Mk3 look tiny! The feet looked absolutely massive, and it was quite a bit taller too.

So is the new WM just scaled larger, or was the IM Mk3 too small?!?
 
Is the scale on this new WM off? I saw a pic from someone in HK (cant find it anymore) showing a side by side comparison of the new WM against the diecast IM MK3, and it makes the Mk3 look tiny! The feet looked absolutely massive, and it was quite a bit taller too.

So is the new WM just scaled larger, or was the IM Mk3 too small?!?

Mark III is too small:
short2.jpg
 
I could've sworn I saw a photo of him next to Die-cast Whiplash . They were the same height . I'll try and find it .
 
It's funny because I always assumed Whiplash was much bigger than IM and WM. It wasn't until this topic came up when DC Whiplash Mk2 released where people said otherwise. Watched it again recently paying careful attention, and wouldn't you know it, he's really not bigger. I don't know if that was the same case for everyone else but I thought it was interesting how my brain automatically assumed he was much bigger than them.
 
I can't wait to get him in hand, he looks amazing. Very glad I have the new VI to go with him too! I think tank is the best way to describe him, that's why I have always preferred this particular design. WM is the heavy blunt instrument to IM's more refined, precision weapon. CW WM is getting back to a bigger design, but the Gatling gun on this one is the icing on a big, badass metal cake!

I always thought Whiplash was a little bigger too but I guess the only time you see them close together is just before they kill him and both IM and WM are crouching/leaning. He is much stockier though, wider and deeper.
 
Back
Top