- Joined
- Sep 20, 2012
- Messages
- 12,404
- Reaction score
- 4,398
I mean to be fair Sideshow kind of implemented that new policy without any heads up (at least not as far as I’ve seen). First time I saw it I wasn’t sure what to think either.
--I mean to be fair Sideshow kind of implemented that new policy without any heads up (at least not as far as I’ve seen). First time I saw it I wasn’t sure what to think either.
Exactly. I'm so hoping it comes out anywhere near the "latest" photos they shared. The HS looks much better than the original proto pics imo. But as we all know, its pretty easy to show another headsculpt and say that's the an actual sample. Asmus pulled that crap with the Ash Henrietta swearing up and down they were showing us one they pulled from a random completed batch...and we all know how that hairless wonder turned out (prior to them doing their fix after the met Mr. Fan).I’m just wanting to see how it turns out. Feels like it could really go either way since we don’t really know much about this company and this figure is their only release.
I'm seeing the eyes not looking so much like they're crossed. In the original photo he looks more like Shawn Ashmore than Hall to me. I don't see it as a standard 'proto to production' situation because I think it looks better than the proto, not a loss in details as usual. I also think the eyes in general look smaller than they do in the latest and sort of beady. I just overall see much more Michael C. Hall in the latest than I did in the proto. The lighting in the latest shots is definitely a contributing factor to some of what you mentioned. Definitely washed out. Id like to see more from them, but I definitely see an improvement.What are you seeing in the latest photos that looks better than the proto?
Disregarding the color cast and lighting conditions, they look pretty similar to me. I think maybe the hair color is lighter. Other than that it looks like your standard 'proto to production' transition to me, standard loss of fine detail in the hair and stubble ... or it's just that the lighting conditions in the latest photo are washing out the detail in the stubble.
View attachment 600313
Enter your email address to join: