- Joined
- Sep 20, 2012
- Messages
- 12,491
- Reaction score
- 4,498
What about him?No one seemed to care about Renner
What about him?No one seemed to care about Renner
The short of it is his ex-wife accused him of abuse and death threats towards herself and her daughter.What about him?
"According to ET, Renner allegedly repeatedly threatened to kill Pacheco and himself, even putting a gun in is mouth and then firing it into the ceiling one night while Ava slept. In court documents acquired by the outlet, Pacheco alleges that in a separate incident, a nanny overheard Renner say he was going to Pacheco’s house to kill her and then himself, because “it was better that Ava had no parents than to have her as a mother.”"
Yes, it is still very early but I hope that there is evidence to prove he is innocent. Sadly even if he is shown to be innocent this will still follow him to some degreeSeems like people should take a wait and see approach for a minute here before jumping to any conclusions. For his sake I am hoping what Majors' defense attorneys are saying here proves to be true.
View attachment 630142
https://www.indiewire.com/2023/03/jonathan-majors-arrested-assault-1234822996/
Its supposed to be the other way around. You don't need to prove innocence in the U.S.Yes, it is still very early but I hope that there is evidence to prove he is innocent. Sadly even if he is shown to be innocent this will still follow him to some degree
You are 100% right, but so many cases like this are tried in the court of public opinion and it certainly is to JM’s advantage to quickly provide evidence that he didn’t do anything “wrong” here. Because by the time a trial could take place and conclude his career would be ruined. And even then if he is acquitted in the proceedings there would be an indelible stain on him.Its supposed to be the other way around. You don't need to prove innocence in the U.S.
“Fatty Arbuckle” comes to mind. It was ages ago, but even though he was cleared of all charges, his reputation never recovered.You are 100% right, but so many cases like this are tried in the court of public opinion and it certainly is to JM’s advantage to quickly provide evidence that he didn’t do anything “wrong” here. Because by the time a trial could take place and conclude his career would be ruined. And even then if he is acquitted in the proceedings there would be an indelible stain on him.
Neither. All Bob Iger cares about is the bottom line. If he thinks it’s more beneficial to keep them, they will. If they think it’s better to drop and move on, they will. Innocence or legality has nothing to do with whether they bank on them to put butts in seats.American Jurisprudence or Newspeak erasure.
This makes complete sense. He’s running a massive company and this is how he needs to manage it.Neither. All Bob Iger cares about is the bottom line. If he thinks it’s more beneficial to keep them, they will. If they think it’s better to drop and move on, they will. Innocence or legality has nothing to do with whether they bank on them to put butts in seats.
Found guilty. So much for that supposed video evidence proving his innocence What a bummer.Seems like people should take a wait and see approach for a minute here before jumping to any conclusions. For his sake I am hoping what Majors' defense attorneys are saying here proves to be true.
View attachment 630142
https://www.indiewire.com/2023/03/jonathan-majors-arrested-assault-1234822996/
While there's now a lot of unknowns regarding Marvel's usage of Kang and related merchandise, I simply hope the victim gets the justice she is owed.Found guilty. So much for that supposed video evidence proving his innocence What a bummer.
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/12/18/nyregion/jonathan-majors-trial-verdict.html
Enter your email address to join: