show73 said:They also told my Brother that if he posted any of this info on the message boards that he would be banned from those as well.
show73 said:They also told my Brother that if he posted any of this info on the message boards that he would be banned from those as well.
Chicky said:I apologize if some collectors do find our policies a bit restrictive or not main stream. We have very simple account rules in place that are meant to avoid messes such as the one posted: Only one account per person. Account holders must use a credit card registered in their name as well as ship to themselves. We also can only discuss the account with the account holder. All of these help us to maintain account security and the final delivery of limited edition items to the appropriate parties.
It is not our intention to frustrate any of our clients. We will work with them to reach resolutions towards many issues that arise with their accounts and orders. We provide civility during this process and expect it in return, otherwise we reserve the right to continue conversations when a reasonable one can be had by all parties involved.
As always, I look forward to feedback on this topic as well as others within this board. It is my hope that as long as the posts are civil, the board manager will not have to remove the thread for any posting policy violations.
Regards,
Chicky
Sideshow Collectibles
drbrad1975 said:Well, Chicky...I appreciate your reply in regards to this matter and it does clear things up but SS's rules do need some rethinking and a line should not be drawn in the sand as regards to their policy. Take my case for instance, a clear history regarding my account status and order history. Just because I move in with someone else who collects, should not disinfranchise me from ordering exclusives, especially since #1 I have a clear and separate history from my brother and #2 I have my own account with a CC number. I understand the policy but like I explained to the CS representative, it is clear that I am a different person and I am a long standing collector. These can be easily ascertained from SS records. It makes no sense to me. Oh well, thanks for the post. I agree that disrespect to one of your employees is should not be tolerated but your employees should also treat consumers with respect and concern, especially if there concerns are vaild.
Cheers,
Brad
pjam said:Well, that is about what you can expect from SSC, experienced professionals providing extraordinary service. They all did their jobs as per the terms of the account holder, stood their ground despite the difficulties and protected the cardholder.
And despite all that, extended a $75 credit which to me is above and beyond reasonable and generous. I'm sorry this ended the way it did and a loyal and I'm sure honorable SSC customer felt slighted, but knowing the rules, you really have to understand the pressures the SSC CS staff have to deal with on a day to day basis and know they have limits too.
Unfortunately there are too many scammers who buy this stuff up, using family members, only to profit from it and that, as is in life, is unfair to the rest of us...
Yo pjam. Totally yo.Bodie The Cursed said:Well stated..
drbrad1975 said:I'm definitely not trying to be judgmental here, but this is exactly why CS issue should stay off the board and be handled with CS directly.
Chicky said:During Show73's phone conversation with our CS department, he ranted that he and his family were big message boarders and that we would 'regret this', as he was going to post and rant all about it publically. Funny how that was not mentione din his post. At no time was he told 'not to post his grievances.' It is his right, just as it is ours to post a reply.
Chicky said:Ultimately the issue is an identity fraud concern flagged for the account in question. When we contacted the user to verify their identity, in order to insure that credit card theft was not taking place, we were contacted by a person other then the account holder by phone. When we were contacted again through e-mail about this account it was from second, different person other the account holder. When we were contacted a third time by phone, it was by original individual who phoned earlier, now supplying a different name.
Chicky said:The simple matter is there are too many people contacting us about an account, not in their name, which draws a BIG FLAG up for us. Proof of identity of the account holder, as we requested, was not supplied, which has caused us to close the account.
Chicky said:I was present for the phone conversation that took place with our rep Erin, the description posted is a bit skewed. I was also present with the call to our CS Manager and heard the client screaming through the phone, which is completely unacceptable no matter the circumstances.
Chicky said:I apologize if some collectors do find our policies a bit restrictive or not main stream. We have very simple account rules in place that are meant to avoid messes such as the one posted: Only one account per person. Account holders must use a credit card registered in their name as well as ship to themselves. We also can only discuss the account with the account holder. All of these help us to maintain account security and the final delivery of limited edition items to the appropriate parties.
Chicky said:It is not our intention to frustrate any of our clients. We will work with them to reach resolutions towards many issues that arise with their accounts and orders. We provide civility during this process and expect it in return, otherwise we reserve the right to continue conversations when a reasonable one can be had by all parties involved.
Chicky said:As always, I look forward to feedback on this topic as well as others within this board. It is my hope that as long as the posts are civil, the board manager will not have to remove the thread for any posting policy violations.
I am certainly not trying to advocate censorship of the boards. And I can certainly understand your example of wanting to know of any dissatisfactions from patients in order for you to improve. I feel exactly the same way, I am very concerned that all of my patients are satisfied and if for some reason they are not I want to know what the problem is so I can work it out and try to improve. Apparently the difference is that I prefer to handles these things one on one with the patient and going through the proper channels.
I can also understand your argument that if no one posts about bad experiences then no one should post about good experiences. Fair is fair, the problem however is that everyone is anxious to post the bad things, but few remember to praise the good things. Maybe because we just expect the good things to be normal.
Customikey said:I used to be (and sort of still am) in a customer service-type position, and I've never taken well to being shouted at. I end conversations when the yelling starts. I refuse to talk to somone who can't express themselves without abusive volume.
Chicky said:DRBrad,
Thanks for your post about our 'Ordering limit policy'. This does infact effect collectors in those few and far between circumstances such as yourself. We are currently looking at this policy so that it can include those caught in these circumstances as well as protect the limit so as many collectors can participate within an edition. Please PM your information, so that I may investigate it further for you and contact you if there is updated news.
Best,
Chicky
Ordering limit policy:
https://www.sideshowtoy.com/cgi-bin/category.cgi?category=ORD&item=ORD2000
User account policy:
https://www.sideshowtoy.com/cgi-bin/category.cgi?category=OUA&item=OUA0910
Enter your email address to join: