Alice Adrenochrome
Super Freak
Bing! That rings a bell: the spiffy new Collector Rewards program from Sideshow! Yes... I wonder when... Sorry, off topic!
DarkArtist81 said:I agree Mikey... I work at a Dr's office and deal with this everyday... When someone starts yelling and threatening me... I always end the call.
Chicky said:...We hope that he will have a more positive purchasing experience with Gentle Giant in the future...
I'm not sure I understand this statement. You say that Show73 could be lying, and even though there's no proof either way, you think that Sideshow is the real liar because they're out to make money. Does that mean that every single time an unsatisfied customer has a problem with a company, the company is always lying because they're out to cover themselves? I don't think everyone is like Enron.DouglasMcc said:Now, do I know this guy is telling the truth? No.. he could be lying his butt off. However, I also have no way of knowing if the Sideshow receptionist/order taker was/is lying. So, without proof either way, I would tend to believe the individual over the business. Because, no matter how much we like Sideshow... they are a company out to make money.
DouglasMcc said:Why do people have to instantly attack someone who has had a bad experience? Rather than discuss the issue, and offer advice, a lot of us turned this person's concerns into an opportunity to kiss major rear with the Sideshow brass.
DouglasMcc said:I do have one concern about the way this topic was handled. Let me start by saying that I have had nothing but great service from SST. However, they are a company, a quickly growing company, and they will have problems ... its unavoidable. Whether it be an irritable employee.. a careless packager with your precious Hulk/Spider Vs., etc. people are going to have bad experiences. And they will come here to voice them. Why do people have to instantly attack someone who has had a bad experience? Rather than discuss the issue, and offer advice, a lot of us turned this person's concerns into an opportunity to kiss major rear with the Sideshow brass.
Now, do I know this guy is telling the truth? No.. he could be lying his butt off. However, I also have no way of knowing if the Sideshow receptionist/order taker was/is lying. So, without proof either way, I would tend to believe the individual over the business. Because, no matter how much we like Sideshow... they are a company out to make money. And, every business practices spin-control. If this person really did recieve the treatment he claims.. actually being laughed at, do you honestly think Sideshow would admit it? No, they would be stupid to -- it would be a PR nightmare. In truth, both sides have a reason to lie. So, I think a forum like this is the perfect place to discuss something like this.
By bringing the issue here, 3 things happen:
1.) If it did happen, Sideshow realizes that they need to talk with/ reprimand their staff without actually having to admit they were wrong. It saves others future frustration without embarrassing SST.
2.) If it didn't happen.. well, nothing really happens other than a liar getting a bit of false bravado.
3.) Or, if its more a matter of wrongs committed on both sides, the two parties have a means to talk through it. We as customers also have a means to make our own decisions and develop our own impressions. I tend to believe the situation was along these lines.
But what happens if we don't bring issues like this to the forums? Well, in all honesty, Sideshow Toys customer service has a blank slate to do whatever they want. I love the company, but without forums and opinions to keep them in check, the wonderful treatment we love now might be MIA when the company is huge (relatively speaking) in the next 3 to 5 years. Never squash consumer dissent. You may end up under the boot the next time.
You could be a diplomat Dusty.SideshowDusty said:I totally agree with you. That's what makes boards such as these a valuable asset to any company that bothers to pay attention to them. We would NEVER even attempt to shut down a thread that is discussing a valid complaint. Never. What would be the point of that? Actually, they are usually quite helpful in further explaining our policies on a more informal, 'face-to-face' level.
Even on our own site commenting area we approve all dissenters, unless they get too personal and start abusing our artists or staff by name (or use foul language). I think this thread provided valuable information to both parties involved. So cheers to everyone for keeping it civil
Batty said:Once again, I'm not taking sides, but when Show73 posted his dilemma, he was basically calling Sideshow out and forcing Dusty and Chicky to defend themselves. Since we weren't involved and don't know the whole story, there's absolutely no way of knowing whose version of the story is true and whose isn't. This was a very specific incident where emotions obviously took over. And when emotions are involved, you get a Rashomon effect. And when that happens, nothing really gets resolved. You just have people airing out their dirty laundry for all to see.
I'm not sure I understand this statement. You say that Show73 could be lying, and even though there's no proof either way, you think that Sideshow is the real liar because they're out to make money. Does that mean that every single time an unsatisfied customer has a problem with a company, the company is always lying because they're out to cover themselves? I don't think everyone is like Enron.
Looking back through this thread I didn't see anyone blatantly attack Show73 or turn this into a Sideshow love-fest. I think a lot of constructive comments were made... for both sides. But I don't think it helped to bring any type of resolution to the matter. Show73 still feels lied to, and I'm sure Sideshow feels that they did the right thing.
I know this is all after the fact, but I felt I had to comment.
DouglasMcc said:No, I was saying that in light of evidence proving guilt either way,I tend to go with the consumer. What reason does the consumer have to lie here? It won't get them back their money. Traffic here is much too small to hurt Sideshow. So, unless the person is just shamelessly crying out for attention, it is more likely that the company is lying. Why would Sideshow lie? Well, they really shouldn't need to.. even if is true. However, coming from a business background, logic doesn't always work in these situations. Sometimes the lies come as an expected response to something that wouldn't have been an issue if not for lies. Reminds me of why I got out of there and took a teaching job. I love Sideshow, and have had all the best of experiences. However, I do not know everyone who works there. I don't know that someone just got dumped and was pissed at the world. I don't know a receptionist hadn't just lost a loved one and was distracted. So many variables. Not sure if my logic makes sense... however, that's how I feel. I respect Sideshow for their reply to my message, at least it seems to imply they took the situation seriously.
I admit, maybe describing it as "attacking" took too much liberty. However, rather than discuss the topic, many people went almost instantly into "we love 'ya Sideshow" mode. Almost like a defensive mother who's child has just been brought home by the police after stealing a car: "No way MY Sideshow would ever do anything like that... he's a 5 star kid!!"
It wouldn't have been so bad if the praise were related to this situation... or at the very least was related to a similar instance. But most were not.
I do not want to sound like I am bashing Sideshow or the people here. Just pointing out what I saw from my perspective.
DouglasMcc said:...What reason does the consumer have to lie here? It won't get them back their money...
DouglasMcc said:No, I was saying that in light of evidence proving guilt either way,I tend to go with the consumer. What reason does the consumer have to lie here? It won't get them back their money.
Enter your email address to join: