ARH Studios two new licenses Frank Frazetta and Tarzan 1/4 scale statues

[a2themonster]

Tarzan vs the Gorilla is a blatant rip off of Sideshow's fury of the beast diorama.

But its not the first time ARH Studios has copied off someone else's work.

Maybe but if that tarzan/gorilla is 1/4 scale it'll own!…again though I want that croc, the concept art was pimp..and I totally agree the frazetta can be fantastic as well

 

[gyro]

Tarzan vs the Gorilla is a blatant rip off of Sideshow's fury of the beast diorama.

Disagree completely if you read the original stories in the pocket novels you would see he had fights with the gorillas a lot (it was essential to the story )

 

[MagnumOpus]

Tarzan vs the Gorilla is a blatant rip off of Sideshow's fury of the beast diorama.

But its not the first time ARH Studios has copied off someone else's work.

Well dude, sorry but your thesis is completely ridiculous! I guess a human body have millions of body movement and facial expression How could some company own the copyright of a human body movement? On the other hand if Tarzan isn't fighting with a gorilla, will you expect him to fight with ALIENS?
I believe to blame someone wouldn't be that easy! Do your homework better and find stronger evidences!

 

[zeus]

Mcfarlane toys has copyrighted that movement from Conan! And since Conan is fighting a gorilla,Tarzan has to find something else to mess with! And i my Opinion Fury of the beast should had conan in the front

 

[Great Pheidias]

Tarzan vs the Gorilla is a blatant rip off of Sideshow's fury of the beast diorama.

But its not the first time ARH Studios has copied off someone else's work.

Our inspiration is this art

Not the Toy by McFarlane's 1/8. Arahom actually had not seen the toy, as the pose is very common it's very easy to say that it's based on the Toy.
And I wanted the snake instead of walking dead guys, so we get the snake

Like averone said before at the slave girl thread...

 

[Pork Chop Express]

Disagree completely if you read the original stories in the pocket novels you would see he had fights with the gorillas a lot (it was essential to the story )

Batman without all his gadgets would almost be a cakewalk for Tarzan.

 

[a2themonster]

Batman without all his gadgets would almost be a cakewalk for Tarzan.

ok you've just crossed serious ass lines bub….

 

[wolf-brother]

WTF cares your just

 

[Pork Chop Express]

Bruce Wayne, a child of privilege who turned himself into a living weapon and will not kill.

John Clayton, never knew other humans existed until after puberty, grew up in a jungle surrounded by killers, and kills when he has too.

 

[a2themonster]

Bruce Wayne, a child of privilege who turned himself into a living weapon and will not kill.

John Clayton, never knew other humans existed until after puberty, grew up in a jungle surrounded by killers, and kills when he has too.

that proves my point imo…bruce is a fighting, killing machine as you put it…heres a brief list of his skills, nothing crazy just stuff he can do with his body, as you said, no gadgets: Genius-level intellect
Peak physical and mental conditioning
Master martial artist, acrobat, detective, escapologist, strategist, swordsman, tactician, and marksman, Master of stealth
Master of disguise
Highly proficient with technology
Excellent observational skills…

Compared to a guy raised by freakin animals, who has no traditional combat skills, an inferior IQ, and only kills because he has to; he's been forced to do what he does for survival, his skills are based around surviving in a jungle, not an outright battle/combat. He has never faced anyone near the caliber of a bruce wayne, with that level of intellect, and that level of skill/capabilities; hell never even another person…while an animal acts on impulse, bruce wayne acts on decisions, strategy, and knowledge of the human anatomy that comes from years and decades of practice and the type of access that only someone with privilege could attain. Bruce wayne has experience combating every type of human enemy possible, tarzan hasn't fought humans like that at all…if the contest was who could kill a tiger quicker, I might (still, only might) give the edge to tarzan..who can win in a hand-to-hand combat scenario? Its laughable that anyone think (not 2 sound insulting) that a jungle boy with no formal training would beat a man with the resume of bruce wayne.

 

[Pork Chop Express]

You can choose to believe what fiction is more plausible I guess.
Tarzan is a killer, Bruce is not. If you read more of some of Tarzan stories, you'll see he much more than a less than average "jungle boy".
And I did say without his gadgets, that is a large part of who Batman is.

I also think Punisher has a distinct advantage being an actual combat vet who kills everyone he can.

 

[a2themonster]

You can choose to believe what fiction is more plausible I guess.
Tarzan is a killer, Bruce is not. If you read more of some of Tarzan stories, you'll see he much more than a less than average "jungle boy".
And I did say without his gadgets, that is a large part of who Batman is.

I also think Punisher has a distinct advantage being an actual combat vet who kills everyone he can.

You're trying to make a connection with killing equating better/superior combat skills, and it just isn't accurate. Batman doesn't kill because he lives by a code, not because his skill set is limited and he can't. My entire argument was made on the premise of without gadgets…before his gadgets he was trained by the league of shadows/assassins, and that speaks for itself. And yes its all "fiction" but thats what we're going off of…from the sound of it you're stuck on who kills the most, not who would win based on their skill level. On intellect alone bruce has tarzan beat before he starts, its as simple as that.

 

[Pork Chop Express]

Intellect and privilege don't guarantee anything really.
There's a huge difference between the intent to kill and to subdue.

Like I said, believe what you like, it's cool. This is just my take on two characters that I've read enough on.

 

[a2themonster]

Intellect and privilege don't guarantee anything really.
There's a huge difference between the intent to kill and to subdue.

Like I said, believe what you like, it's cool. This is just my take on two characters that I've read enough on.

intellect guarantees everything; the smarter combatant can use their skill set to their advantage to win. Combat, and even sports like boxing and mma, are where the mind rules the body…this is fighting and combat 101 stuff here…but I digress as this isn't the right thread for this but I appreciate the dialogue!

 

[Josh-A-Tron]

Wait wait wait....Did someone just say that because a guy grew up fighting gorilla's to the Death he can Beat one of the Greatest Martial Artists and Combat Tactitions in all of comics? The guy who has survived Fights with metahumans, monsters, aliens and megalomaniacal villains....and some dude who fought gorilla's in a loincloth is going to beat just because he left his belt home?

That's a tough pill to swallow.

 

[a2themonster]

Wait wait wait....Did someone just say that because a guy grew up fighting gorilla's to the Death he can Beat one of the Greatest Martial Artists and Combat Tactitions in all of comics? The guy who has survived Fights with metahumans, monsters, aliens and megalomaniacal villains....and some dude who fought gorilla's in a loincloth is going to beat just because he left his belt home?

That's a tough pill to swallow.

thank you good sir

 

[MagnumOpus]

Well I love Tarzan, I really do but we are talking Batman here who is the world's greatest detective of all time! He is the dark knight, caped crusader and number one well known superhero of all! Tarzan is a fictional character, on the other hand Batman is a fictional SUPERHERO End of discussion))

 

[CallMeTheDoctor]

On a different note (from the Batman vs. Tarzan), I would really love to see more of Jane

okay I'm done, but I think Bruce Lee would beat either Batman or Tarzan, just saying.

 

[DaveMac]

Marv would slap the cuffs on all of them and then slice n dice!


Now show us something concrete

 

[Ex-Parrot]

Intellect and privilege don't guarantee anything really.
There's a huge difference between the intent to kill and to subdue.

Like I said, believe what you like, it's cool. This is just my take on two characters that I've read enough on.

You'll never win this argument, too many people only see the dumbed down Tarzan of the movies, with the comedy sidekick chimp. That's if they have any experience or knowledge of Tarzan at all. Sadly very few people know the character from the books. They don't know Tarzan as an intelligent character. They don't know his true capabilities as a warrior, his savvy and instinct, or the savagery that he is capable of when pushed or required.

Much like Aquaman is incorrectly labelled as just that lame guy that talks to fish by so many, Tarzan is merely the dumb nice guy that shouts and swings through trees a lot. It's not right, but it's the common perception. And until that common perception changes, you won't argue anyone who doesn't know any better out of thinking that way.