Avengers: Age of Ultron (May 1st, 2015)

[Niltusk]

Re: The Avengers 2: Avenging Again

That's about a figure. No matter what, you'll have people nit picking them to death. It one thing to have it in hand and it being terrible and complaining, but some just go ape ____ over nothing. It's laughable.

If you're interested in something why wouldn't you speculate on what you're going to like and dislike? discussion board and all...

 

[The Ween]

Re: The Avengers 2: Avenging Again

Well some folks here hold their $200 toys to very high standards. Considering what they probably pay for female company I kind of get it.

If you're interested in something why wouldn't you speculate on what you're going to like and dislike? discussion board and all...

You missed the point. There's nothing wrong with it. But when they put up graphs showing how this line is off or how this part is just a hair too long. It's just beyond wanting a little better sculpt. I even sa whwere they're complaining about Commissioner Gordon not having a deep enough wrinkle on his face in one spot.

This isn't the thread for this anyhow, so I don't want to debate about it. There's enough of that in the individual threads.

 

[Niltusk]

Re: The Avengers 2: Avenging Again

You missed the point. There's nothing wrong with it. But when they put up graphs showing how this line is off or how this part is just a hair too long. It's just beyond wanting a little better sculpt. I even sa whwere they're complaining about Commissioner Gordon not having a deep enough wrinkle on his face in one spot.

This isn't the thread for this anyhow, so I don't want to debate about it. There's enough of that in the individual threads.

Right, this is the thread for which actresses are too fat or thin and to estimate Steven Seagal's toughness.

 

[thenammagazine]

Re: The Avengers 2: Avenging Again

That's about a figure. No matter what, you'll have people nit picking them to death. It one thing to have it in hand and it being terrible and complaining, but some just go ape ____ over nothing. It's laughable.

Some of the OCD _____es here really need therapy and high dosage meds.

Well some folks here hold their $200 toys to very high standards. Considering what they probably pay for female company I kind of get it.

$15 for a 5th of Jack to get their mom drunk so they can play peek-a-boo privates? Because with the amount of critiquing they do on figures, there's no way any woman but their mother would touch them for any amount of money.

 

[Frank]

Re: The Avengers 2: Avenging Again

Mmmmmm-hmmmm! That Scarlett does look good! Physically, she suffers from the same thing everyone does (except for Hulk); she's shorter and less idealized than her comic counterparts. Emily Blunt would have been a better match for BW in that category imo, but ScarJo is serviceable. As an actress, she's not the most expressive. Probably the most obvious problem is her relationship with Hawkeye. Renner can share some of the blame too, but if they're supposed to have a close connection it's merely nominal.

I mean, they can't all be a Sarah Douglas in her heyday. Now that chick was bad!

 

[YoNoSe]

Re: The Avengers 2: Avenging Again

Some of the OCD _____es here really need therapy and high dosage meds.



$15 for a 5th of Jack to get their mom drunk so they can play peek-a-boo privates? Because with the amount of critiquing they do on figures, there's no way any woman but their mother would touch them for any amount of money.

Maybe Scarlet has a Facebook page they could post Photoshops on so that she can make herself acceptable.

 

[meanstreak]

Re: The Avengers 2: Avenging Again

“SEQUEL TO MARVEL’S THE AVENGERS TO HIT THEATERS MAY 1, 2015
The Walt Disney Studios has announced a release date for Marvel Studios’ sequel to the biggest Super Hero blockbuster and third highest grossing film of all time, Marvel’s The Avengers. Joss Whedon returns to write and direct the UNTITLED MARVEL’S AVENGERS SEQUEL set for release May 1, 2015.”

Read more at https://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/MarvelFreshman/news/?a=65828#G3pt93WkfXrMgGQt.99

 

[Khev]

Re: The Avengers 2 (May 1st, 2015)

So "Marvel Phase II" will be:

Iron Man 3 (May 3, 2013)
Thor: The Dark World (November 8, 2013)
Captain America: The Winter Soldier (April 4, 2014)
Guardians of the Galaxy (August 1, 2014)
Ant-Man
The Avengers 2 (May 1, 2015)

I wonder how it will stack up to Phase I.

 

[intothevoid]

Re: The Avengers 2: Avenging Again

I even sa whwere they're complaining about Commissioner Gordon not having a deep enough wrinkle on his face in one spot.

That was me.



His wrinkles are a defining feature

 

[plasmid303]

Re: The Avengers 2 (May 1st, 2015)

I wonder how it will stack up to Phase I.

Higher expectations.

 

[hunnipot85]

Re: The Avengers 2 (May 1st, 2015)

I'm guessing Ant Man and the Guardians of the Galaxy will likely play a role.

I'm hoping we get Scarlet Witch, Wasp or Ms. Marvel in a film. We need a super heroine.

Now that Daredevil is back at Marvel Studios possibly he could be in one of the future Marvel films?

 

[thenammagazine]

Re: The Avengers 2 (May 1st, 2015)

So "Marvel Phase II" will be:

Iron Man 3 (May 3, 2013)
Thor: The Dark World (November 8, 2013)
Captain America: The Winter Soldier (April 4, 2014)
Guardians of the Galaxy (August 1, 2014)
Ant-Man
The Avengers 2 (May 1, 2015)

I wonder how it will stack up to Phase I.

I'm sure with them acquiring Daredevil, and the hints about Black Panther, there might be some other films tucked in there.

 

[Darth Cruel]

Re: The Avengers 2 (May 1st, 2015)

I like Daredevil. I always considered him to be a sort of Marvel version of Batman.

So I am really excited to see how Marvel does a movie of him.


As far as Avengers 2 and the lead-in movies...Marvel seems to be committing to a pretty huge movie schedule in a very short 3 year period.


If these movies are as good as round one, it will make for a truly epic three years of Marvel superhero movies.

 

[The Josh]

Re: The Avengers 2 (May 1st, 2015)

Iron Man 3 looks awesome and I think round 2 will be every bit as good.

 

[wofford29]

Re: The Avengers 2 (May 1st, 2015)

Surely they're not going to have a phase II that doesn't include the Hulk and then just have him pop up in Avengers 2.

 

[Khev]

Re: The Avengers 2 (May 1st, 2015)

Surely they're not going to have a phase II that doesn't include the Hulk and then just have him pop up in Avengers 2.

That's what it looks like.

 

[intothevoid]

Re: The Avengers 2 (May 1st, 2015)

Surely they're not going to have a phase II that doesn't include the Hulk and then just have him pop up in Avengers 2.

I think it's smart.

Hulk was used in just the right dosage in Avengers IMO. Less is more, leave him for Avengers 2, it'll serve them well.

 

[wofford29]

Re: The Avengers 2 (May 1st, 2015)

Avengers is a Hulk movie so I guess Avengers 2 will be the same.

 

[Khev]

Re: The Avengers 2 (May 1st, 2015)

I wonder if he'll pop up in one of the other movies in the meantime.

 

[wofford29]

Re: The Avengers 2 (May 1st, 2015)

He needs to be the new Agent Coulson.