Avengers: Age of Ultron (May 1st, 2015)

Collector Freaks Forum

Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
142 minutes is more than enough, so I'm happy that it won't be a 3 hour borefest. If it takes 3 hours to tell a simple story of a robot going crazy, then there's something wrong :lol
 
I was watching a featurette and saw Thor like this...

muTaJ14.png


Which looks sooo perfect, why can't he just wear that, his helmet, his puffy cape attached with the little metal circles above his chest and call it a day? It looks so much better like that, but nooooo, needs ugly rubbery stupidly overdesigned vest :lol
 
142 minutes is more than enough, so I'm happy that it won't be a 3 hour borefest. If it takes 3 hours to tell a simple story of a robot going crazy, then there's something wrong :lol

I'm not going just for the story... I'm going mainly for the spectacle that it is to see all those superheroes on screen, so the more the merrier.
 
I was watching a featurette and saw Thor like this...

muTaJ14.png


Which looks sooo perfect, why can't he just wear that, his helmet, his puffy cape attached with the little metal circles above his chest and call it a day? It looks so much better like that, but nooooo, needs ugly rubbery stupidly overdesigned vest :lol

Because...

0OHVcDr.jpg
 
I never felt either way about him, just like Nolan, but the praise he's got was evident, and now I see more people every day calling him crap.

Maybe he's always been crap, I've never been a fan of him, but I think it's more just people coming down hard from the Whedon high.

That's nothing, if AOU sucks...the fanboy rage will be hilarious. :lol

I don't see AoU sucking, I see it being the same as Avengers 1, I don't see Whedon being innovative, but one thing's for sure, it's gonna be fun and entertaining.
 
Back
Top