Baroness Premium Format [High Res Pics in First Post]

Collector Freaks Forum

Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
tumblr_m0c4fxUGMR1qe342po1_500.gif

:lol :lol :lol

Good one, BuffyGirl! :lol
 
This is very sexy and if I could fit her into my collection I would, congrats on all who ordered the exclusive.
 
He heel design was for the sake of using the same mold as the rest of the Joe line. Based on that card art, we should be mad that her body armor is too curvy in the PF and that her hair isn't stringy at the ends :p
 
She has had heels in the comics for so many years I think I posted pictures of the heels in various issues many pages back I think she started in issue 18 of the marvel run
Baroness didn't actually appear in G.I. Joe #18, nor could she have been wearing heels if she did, as she was confined to a hospital bed with her entire body (excepting her hair, oddly) wrapped in bandages from injuries sustained in G.I. Joe #16.

Her costume had flat heels in her first appearance in the first issue, and thereafter her boots appear to fluctuate between having high heels and being as as flat as the card art for the action figure, often in-between panels in the same issue, so obviously there's some artistic inconsistency in the visuals in the comics.

As far as the statue though, it's just... it's like if Rob Liefeld was given charge of making a statue based on v2 Snake Eyes. :slap
 
lol for a min i thought i was at the star wars section watching the vader thread.

the heels make baroness look cooler, love it.

:slap
 
Baroness didn't actually appear in G.I. Joe #18, nor could she have been wearing heels if she did, as she was confined to a hospital bed with her entire body (excepting her hair, oddly) wrapped in bandages from injuries sustained in G.I. Joe #16.

Her costume had flat heels in her first appearance in the first issue, and thereafter her boots appear to fluctuate between having high heels and being as as flat as the card art for the action figure, often in-between panels in the same issue, so obviously there's some artistic inconsistency in the visuals in the comics.

As far as the statue though, it's just... it's like if Rob Liefeld was given charge of making a statue based on v2 Snake Eyes. :slap

ok I got my issues mixed up she first had stilletos in issue 39:
Sweet. Post it when you do. :D

these are from issues 15-39, she goes from clunky heels to flat heels to no heels to stilleto in 39 and she should have the higher bangs, but I thought that was an artist interpretation....been awhile since I seen these issues...makes me want to read them again.








 
ok I got my issues mixed up she first had stilletos in issue 39:

these are from issues 15-39, she goes from clunky heels to flat heels to no heels to stilleto in 39 and she should have the higher bangs, but I thought that was an artist interpretation....been awhile since I seen these issues...makes me want to read them again.
Hence my citing the card art as the authoritative depiction. :p

and the Rob Liefeld remark isn't accurate, she doesn't have one heel larger than the other....ba...zing!
You're thinking of Todd McFarlane. Rob Liefeld is more notable for not drawing heels (or feet, for that matter) at all. ;)
 
Back
Top