Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice (March 24th, 2016)

Collector Freaks Forum

Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Killing this Superman in only his second appearance seems a bit....well I don't know what to think of that. On the one hand it means that Doomsday isn't entirely wasted, he does the thing he's known for doing - just, in the original story, correct me if I'm wrong, Superman was already loved and embraced....whereas it seems like in this film the intention is that only by ''dying'' for us does he become loved and embraced? Hmmm....well I'll have to see how this plays.

In other words: damage control in its ugliest form.
But if it's good for the narrative then I'm fine.
 
Regarding possible major spoiler

Killing this Superman in only his second appearance seems a bit....well I don't know what to think of that. On the one hand it means that Doomsday isn't entirely wasted, he does the thing he's known for doing - just, in the original story, correct me if I'm wrong, Superman was already loved and embraced....whereas it seems like in this film the intention is that only by ''dying'' for us does he become loved and embraced? Hmmm....well I'll have to see how this plays.

Making a martyr of a hated . saving the city... Figure... Down
 
Last edited:
Don't know how anybody could be surprised by that, as soon as I saw Doomsday I assumed that would happen, why else would he be in the movie?

Not to be a smart ass, but I don't even read comics and I know what Doomsday being in the film means.
 
Last edited:
No, I don't think it was a given even with them using Doomsday. Especially not in a film called Batman V Superman. Way to cram the **** out of the movie.
 
No, I don't think it was a given even with them using Doomsday. Especially not in a film called Batman V Superman. Way to cram the **** out of the movie.

Just seems like it would be a waste of the character without those consequences. I agree, one of the things this movie is likely to suffer from is being crammed with everything but the kitchen sink. It's like they are trying to make 3 films in one, which is never a good idea.
 
Last edited:
Just seems like it would be a waste of the character without those consequences. I agree, one of the things this movie is likely to suffer from is being crammed with everything but the kitchen sink. It's like they are trying to make 3 films in one, which is never a good idea.

Agreed. It would have been a waste. And I wouldn't have put it past them to do exactly that - waste Doomsday. So that's why I didn't think it was a given that Superman would die in this
 
Back
Top