Re: Batman vs. Superman (2016)
You know I'll actually give all this to you because I really do believe that it's basically what Nolan was trying to say but he apparently just had no clue on how to structure the events to actually make that feasible and certainly didn't communicate it to the audience in anything other than lip service from the characters. "The streets are clean." Khev: "Um, okay, and how again?" Nolan: "Don't ask--look! A cool Batcopter!" Khev: "ooooooh."
Keep in mind that unlike these other hooligans here () I actually really, really like TDKR. I just do. So I take those areas where the execution just SUCKS and I can ride it out because of all the other cool stuff.
Something that I find really funny though is that for all the the things that I do like about TDKR and even TDK I feel that both movies just kind of drag for good periods of time. For that reason I actually find myself getting sucked into the *Schumacher* films easier when they're on TV. If TDK or TDKR are on TV and I flip to it and the Joker isn't talking, a semi isn't flipping over, or Catwoman isn't walking toward the bike I just go "eh" and move on. But if Batman Forever or Robin is on I just have this sick compulsion to tune in and enjoy the absurdity. So make of that what you will.
Technically, all of the stuff from the Dent act happened prior to that night. Harvey put them away with his R.I.C.O. case. It's kind of funny because it goes into that gray area, again; Batman and Gordon abused the system, yes, but it's a broken system, as he said in Begins. If there was even a hint of mental incompetence in the air, all of those criminals would've been back out on the street, even though Harvey was completely sound of mind when he put them away. Then, it would've been the criminals abusing the system for their own gain.
The point isn't that Batman "won," it's that he leveled the playing field. To try to put it into perspective, I'll make an analogy. Batman is the greatest soldier on the battlefield. He could keep fighting, but he'll always be fighting for the losing side. The question becomes "if removing your greatest asset from the battlefield is what it takes to, potentially, put your army on the winning side, would you do it?" Batman knew there would be sacrifices, but, at the end of the day, he also knew that, if he continued to fight, it would undo all of what he and Gordon and Dent had accomplished. It's about weighing your options. Tackle the rapists and the muggers and the killers and let the plague that infected Gotham flood the streets again, or leave the others to the police, now that they can handle it, and, possibly, save the city's soul in the process?
You know I'll actually give all this to you because I really do believe that it's basically what Nolan was trying to say but he apparently just had no clue on how to structure the events to actually make that feasible and certainly didn't communicate it to the audience in anything other than lip service from the characters. "The streets are clean." Khev: "Um, okay, and how again?" Nolan: "Don't ask--look! A cool Batcopter!" Khev: "ooooooh."
Keep in mind that unlike these other hooligans here () I actually really, really like TDKR. I just do. So I take those areas where the execution just SUCKS and I can ride it out because of all the other cool stuff.
Something that I find really funny though is that for all the the things that I do like about TDKR and even TDK I feel that both movies just kind of drag for good periods of time. For that reason I actually find myself getting sucked into the *Schumacher* films easier when they're on TV. If TDK or TDKR are on TV and I flip to it and the Joker isn't talking, a semi isn't flipping over, or Catwoman isn't walking toward the bike I just go "eh" and move on. But if Batman Forever or Robin is on I just have this sick compulsion to tune in and enjoy the absurdity. So make of that what you will.