Re: Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice
Do you know the characters that those cos-players costumes are based on? Guess what, they look just like the character. That's the point. All of those costumes are VERY high quality and look more like the characters they are based on than Gadot looks like Wonder Woman. Covering your eyes and shaking your head, doesn't change that.
No I don't, and if their respective characters' outfits are meant to look like home-made cosplays, then great, nailed it, but I specifically said a costume that looked
better that Gadot's, which to any normal human being would've replied with WW cosplay costumes, but despite the fact that you didn't, those costumes you posted are
not better nor higher quality.
Accuracy was not the issue here now was it? Then we enter the realm that the 100% accurate costumes for superhero movies are non-existent and in fact, this WW movie costume is closer to the source than most superhero movie costumes.
So, 1st of your points, not proven.
On to your argument about the Sups pic, it's actually pretty funny. Cause it's like you don't think the Superman pic was manipulated. Smdh
You obviously don't work with Photoshop, nor do you seem to have a familiarity with high pixel density photographs taken by DSLR's and from your answer, and your replies seem to revolve around you not wanting to believe that photo enhancing people....doesn't.....exist?
My point was that Supes' pic WAS altered around the edges.... Can you read?
I'm not denying enhancements using PS, you silly
I was saying that cutting one pic and putting it on top of another DOES affect the original pic's edges.
And no, I don't know **** about PS.
You can clearly see the bottom of her quads in that pic, acting like you don't see it, doesn't help your argument. Her legs are still sticks, yet they don't look that way in the photo. Larger quads just don't magically disappear several inches above your knees.
Again, can you read? Further more, do you have an eye problem? I don't want to be insensitive if you do.
Sigh, anyway, yeah, you're wrong, what you
can clearly see in that pic is just about where the shin guards are covering in the poster, nothing more.
Some more evidence....
Her arms look exactly the same size in this pic from years ago.
Actually, she looks bigger from this pageant pic than she does at Comic Con.
So once again. I have made my points. I suppose you can still keep trying to say I'm wrong, "cause you say so".
You suppose right, but not cause I say so, because your "evidence" says so.
And what you prove there is that Gadot's detractors have been using her worst possible angles and pics to make their points, because the last pic there has good wonder woman body.
Also her arms are clearly thinner in the 1st pics than what we've seen recently.
Well that explains it.
Yup, exemplary like a stool sample.
it still conveniently supports my point
