Yeah, I'm just the opposite on that front. I fixate exclusively on the original screen-used pieces...screencaps and film reference. So for me, it's always the fan sculpts that look "weird". I've always thought that the Hird helmet looked "chubby", the Mander looked like a "baby Celtic", and the Ruffkin was the "Jay Leno" of Celtic helmets. (And don't even get me started on all those wonky Thailand helmets...)
Don't get me wrong...for anyone who puts in the time and energy to try and sculpt one of these things...more power to ya'. Everyone gives it their best shot. Some come out a little better than others...but it's always a great artistic exercise. And they serve a purpose: You can't wear a Sideshow helmet like this. So if you're one of those costuming people...fan sculpts are a necessity.
But for someone like myself who is only interested in display pieces that are as accurate to the original screen-used helmets as possible, I'll only go with something that has some lineage to the original.
As far as the craftsmanship goes...meh. It's pretty much what we all knew was coming. It was apparent from the hi-res catalog photos that there would be no lenses. I am happy to see that the copper greeblies do not stand out as much as the promotional pictures suggested.
All in all...I'll just cut some plexi and fit them into the eye sockets for that "reflective" lense appearance. Easy fix. Disappointing? Yeah. Sideshow is definitely cutting corners, and I agree that it's reprehensible considering how much they're charging for these things. But personally...I'd still rather have a helmet cast from the original than a fan sculpt.