Does Rogue One detract from A New Hope?

Collector Freaks Forum

Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Does Rogue One detract from A New Hope?

  • Yes, RO detracts from ANH

    Votes: 11 13.9%
  • No, RO neither detracts from nor enhances ANH

    Votes: 18 22.8%
  • No, RO enhances ANH

    Votes: 49 62.0%
  • Not sure

    Votes: 1 1.3%

  • Total voters
    79
Actually I've never been one of those foot/toe/shoe guys. That always seemed weirdly obsessive to me.

*goes back to looking for headless characters in RO frame by frame*

But clothes and shoes all look the same in a pile by the bed :rotfl:lol
 
But that was my point about Captain Antilles. He literally killed him before he could answer the question. :D But then a few seconds later he gathered himself and interrogated Leia.

Antilles has no useful information, therefore he is disposable. Leia does, therefore not disposable.

Plus, you'd have to think Vader's not the most mentally stable dude in the galaxy.
 
Let's be honest...some of these younglings were never going to make it anyway. A couple of them have their lightsabers pointed at themselves. :lol Plus, the little green one looks like he's stuck at some camp with mandatory activities that he has no interest in that his parents made him go to so they could get a break from the responsibilities of being a parent. That being said, he's still my favorite because he looks like he gives zero ****s about being there.

DaDj6zk.png
 
''Too old to begin the training'' always seemed like nonsense to me.

Getting them when they're children on the other hand is not only morally dubious but a plain bad idea. It's a miracle there wasn't a permanent flow of Sith coming out of that academy.
 
Last edited:
''Too old to begin the training'' always seemed like nonsense to me.

Getting them when they're children on the other hand is not only morally dubious but a plain bad idea.



That's why I've always felt the Jedi were bad guys. Even in the OT, Obi-Wan and Yoda are manipulative *******s.

"You only get to be a Jedi if you kill your own dad. That's why we lied to you about him, we want you to kill him. If you don't, you're a loser, the Emperor has already won and we'll find someone else to do what we want."

No better than Palpatine honestly. Stealing kids from their families and raising them to be emotionless weirdo monks makes them even worse.
 
Yoda's line in THE EMPIRE STRIKES BACK always seemed like nonsense to me.

978.gif


a-dev no! :horror :lol

In all seriousness though Samurai and Shaolin monks were trained from the age of 3 so based on that I'm fine with the concept as implied in ESB. However the PT notion that children were basically abducted from their families according to Midichlorian count is downright stupid.
 
Why does that one have a shrunken down version of Qui-Gon's lightsaber.
 
It was very poor writing for Ben *and* The Emperor to both be pressuring Luke to do the exact same thing (kill Vader.)

At least Yoda left it vague with simply saying "you must face him."

"I can't kill my own father/Then the Emperor has already won" was just a terrible exchange as was Ben's commentary on moral relativism. That one scene really tainted his character. It's like he carried all the foolish mindsets that caused him to fail in training Vader with him into the afterlife.

I complain that Jedi turned Han, Vader, and Fett into sissies but Ben might have fared worst of all. Thank God that movie had the gold bikini and such a kickass space battle, lol.
 
I'll be honest, I don't like kids enough to give a **** that Anakin killed them. It just seemed like something Lucas threw in to make his transition to a Sith more shocking. Go to a daycare sometime and see if you think those kids should be trained in The Force. It's a horrible idea.
 
Back
Top