Why is someone who can spend $2000 on a toy not to be taken seriously? Because it has little significance to you or insults your morals for responsible spending?
How about the person that has collectively gathered $2000 worth of toy(s)? are they to be dismissed as people that cant be taken seriously because you dont agree with the dollar value attached to that collection?
Your post makes no sense to me. At what price point do you start considering things to be taken seriously?. I guess it makes no differance because according to you a $8 item is equal to a $8000 item. You can spin your statment 100 different ways and it still makes no sense.
A $100k home is = to a 1 million dollar home
A $1000 car is = to a $100,000 car
A $10 toy is = to a $1000 toy
ect...
So, the person who pays more to get more for something, and not have it deliver has no right to complain?. Yet a person that pays much less for something is allowed to becaue paying less for something meets your standard of "reasonable spending".
Im sorry, thats not how the world works....at all.
Just because you think you sound clever doesnt make you clever.
Gezz, I dont know how you collect anything at all as you have so many limitations and criteria to meet. Its as if you spend just as much time contemplating how a piece makes it into your collection as a person that spends the same time contemplating the quality and detail that should reflect a $2000 piece.
Looking forward to your next witty and clever post.
Chris