I hear ya. I have much more nostalgia for the OT than I ever did with the PT. The OT is what I grew up on and they were something that I've loved since I was a kid.
My thing is that I didn't mind the PT. I thought ROTS was the better out of the 3 (and the most watchable). I didn't care for TPM. Thought it was too geared for children and watching Jar Jar suck the life out of that movie was all I could take.
To be honest, guests that come over the house can't tell the difference between the Vader helmets (like we can on this forum). When they see the ROTS Vader Helmet on display, they know what it is and they think it's the same Vader that they remember from the OT. I know there is a difference though...but it's an extra $799 + shipping that I don't have right now.
Right...when all the promo for the OT on DVD started, nobody could tell that the Vader suit they were seeing was that of the as yet unreleased Episode III...because there was very little "sith" official promo at the time...
Considering Star Wars was the first movie I ever saw in 1977 at Grauman's Chinese Theatre in Hollywood, ANH Vader is my most nostalgic image and is my collecting focus above others. However I do love the symmetry of the ROTS helmet and the way ot looks head on...
Remember, even though it was ultimately computer controlled, it was duplicated by choosing one side over the other and assembled by hand ... I love the look (though it is indeed a different, if more "youthful", face of Vader)
My Favorite is the ESB or Jedi look, but I associate most of my childhood memories with the ANH helmet...
The little scratches and scuffs that these folks are nitpicking, the most important "landmark" scars of the helmet are not obvious in the film and therefore don't matter so much to me -- the c scratch is obvious and must be there -- the two smudges on his right cheek edge are also obvious and the mottling in the mouth grill -- and they are there...so that's fine with me...they don't have to be 100% the same just enough to be mistaken for an actual one at 10 feet away by 99 % of the hardcore fans...as long as it shows clearly in the film and the prop matches it -- that's fine ... this helmet was made by official means it is licensed and it was taken directly from molds taken from Lucasfilm archives...the quality of paints and the generation of the mold are of utmost provenance and so I am happy with these eFx helmets thus far.
I LOVE a well made mass produced item and value it over a one of a kind, because there's something about getting an item like that , that was made to such nigh standards just for the collectors. There's something that feels like love and care was poured into it just for us, the popular niche...that's a lot of work to insure that a product of this magnitude and plurality is made with such a high level of quality and care from the product planning, replication, quality control and testing, finishing, and packaging to the handling of it...it is worth it just for all the work and effort and care -- even if it was made without some of the scars that some people are attached to, but many aren't.
Not one toy or prop I've ever come across was 100% accurate, and that's fine because it is different from the original anyway -- believe me, if you wanted a 100% accurate helmet, there would just be foam lining, unfinished fiberglass and lots of velcro just hanging around...props were made to be seen and many time things weren't cleaned up thoroughly because frankly the cameras couldn't pick most of it up...Did you know that the set on Jeopardy was changed partly because now gthat things were beginning to be filmed in HD, the fake marble sets just looked like printed wall paper?...same with the Vader helmet, they knew going in that not all the little details would be picked up on film but enough weathering and it would appear to be a real metallic helmet that's been through a few battles...the only very critical details (thus idealized) were that aside from random weathering, the surfaces of the helmets had to be made to pop from the black color, so that the shape can be seen and so the specific surfaces were painted for photographic reasons. ..
I'm happy with what I've seen so far from eFX, true there are tiny details that aren't there, but nothing jarring...1st generation from an actual helemt? I'm in. Molds by Rick Baker? I'm in. Gino (one of the few of the most picky vader dudes? - truth is, as long as it passes for one of these dudes even randomly, because they all know vader more intimately than I do detail-wise - I'm in. (becuase I have my own experience of Vader and it doesn't hinge on the tiny tiny details, just the characteristic ones) It doesn't have to be a consensus for me. Bryan (Lover of all things Star wars and prop guru? I'm in. eFx, quality company who placed so much love and effort into the McVader? I'm all in.
I dont care if they missed a couple of what very few consider landmark scars on the helmet...as long as the paint pattern is fine nd the provenance is correct and the obvious details are there I'm happy...
btw some of those pics on rpf to show how "wrong" the dome is , is biased because it is obvious that the angles are all completely off...people who are supposed to be so detail oriented that they could nitpick a scar of three should be totally aware if one vader helmet is at a different angle than another, don't you think?
So bottom line, I'm very VERy happy with what we've seen so far. So hopefully it lives up to the photos at the very least...and hopefully the handpainters have ways to keep the level of QC very high.
I'm so excited about these helmets I've ordered one of each...I refrained from getting 2 of the Legend for the fact that I didn't wanna have to choose a favorite between 2 - I'd just drive myself crazy, plus I figured it'd be nice for the few 250 to go to as many different collectors as possible who wanted one...