Maybe, but he'd squeeze in somewhere late like 45-50.
When I think of legendary players in any sport it's typically top 5 or 10.
He didn't make the '50 Greatest Players in NBA history" list celebrated in '96 selected by a blue-ribbon panel of media, former players and coaches, current and former general managers and team executives.
https://www.nba.com/history/players/50greatest.html
Regardless, Worm does make a pretty cool 1/6 figure for Enterbay to take on.
His look is very unique and he'd display well
You're in a good mood this Friday morning
Naismith Memorial Basketball Hall of Fame Class of 2011
5-time NBA Champion: 1989, 1990, 1996, 1997, 1998
2-time NBA Defensive Player of the Year: 1990, 1991
IBM Award: 1992
8-time NBA All-Defensive Selection
First Team: 1989-93, 1995, 1996
Second Team: 1994
2-time All-NBA Third Team: 1992, 1995
2-time NBA All-Star: 1990, 1992
Ranked #48 on the 2009 revision of SLAM Magazine's Top 50 Players of All-time
not legendary enough for you??
to answer your question..no he is not legendary enough for me. I don't need you to list al those stats which I was already aware of, doesn't change the fact that there are tons of other players they could have done way before him that are more of a legend then rodman. I don't need to list them here cause we can all name 20 players straight off the top of our heads that were more of a legend then rodman. sure he's a great player, obviously since he made the hall. but this guy wouldn't make most peoples top 50. my definition of legendary does not include rodman. legendary is reserved or should be reserved for more well rounded players. defensively, sure he's a beast. legendary, no.
If you were to compile a list of the best NBA players of All Time would Worm be in your top 10? 25? 50? 100?
Easily top 50, his defense is that great.
If you only judge a player based on his all aroundness, then i doubt Shaq can make it to top 50.
I also doubt Jason Kidd is good since he's only good at moving the ball & assist, and now coaching.
BTW if they made a Karl Malone figure, we can pit them inside a WWE ring. They might even do WWE figs.
Easily top 50, his defense is that great.
If you only judge a player based on his all aroundness, then i doubt Shaq can make it to top 50.
I also doubt Jason Kidd is good since he's only good at moving the ball & assist, and now coaching.
BTW if they made a Karl Malone figure, we can pit them inside a WWE ring. They might even do WWE figs.
Nobody said Worm wasn't good, the discussion was whether he is "legendary".
The NBA media, players, coaches who voted on the 50 Greatest NBA players of All Time list in '96 didn't think he was.
If a player is legendary he is hands down, unarguably a top 5 maybe top 10 player in his sport ie Michael Jordan. There's absolutely no discussion whether or not MJ is legendary.
Worm was a beast of a defender hands down and deserved his HOF spot, but when you're top 51-60 or further down the line that isn't legendary - that's great imo.
Not relevant to Enterbay whether or not there are 47 better players in history.
"No only my definition of legend is correct. It doesn't matter what is generally accepted or what you believe!"
Clever attempt but it doesn't really work.
The way I have stated what you're quoting doesn't contradict what anyone else is saying. And you've had to cut off the second sentence to try to make it fit the joke.
Or do you feel it really is relevant to Enterbay's decision making whether or not there are 47 better players ?
It worked hook, line & sinker.
The discussion that was on going wasn't regarding Enterbay's decision making. If you're upset about the discussion skip it instead of attempting to troll and failing
Enter your email address to join: