chewblacca
Super Freak
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2007
- Messages
- 3,996
- Reaction score
- 17
If the story is good with solid writing usually you can't go wrong.
Streaming it.
12 minutes: The writing is very poor.
15 minutes: Well, not all of it. Nice scene.
16 minutes: Oops, obvious rewrite/reshoot started. Franklin Storm is an awful person.
17 minutes: I apologise, Franklin Storm is just incredibly naive and dumb.
21 minutes: HOLY ****, why was this crap released at all?!?!?!
31 minutes: Obvious CGI chimpanzee in a movie where Toby Kebbell is a villain... Good job, FOX!
53 minutes: Last five minutes were bleak as hell with very little context.36 minutes: Yep, Doom got Reed drunk and both decided to make an unauthorized travel to another dimension to be "the first ones". Why Johny, Ben or Susan went there? Who knows.
41 minutes: Why the hell they had US flag on a metal pole with them???
A studio doesn't order reshooting if the original product was good
While I wouldn't excuse Trank's behavior, I can sort of understand it, based on what information we've seen trickle forward. He's a fairly young, and inexperienced guy. He plays videogames a lot apparently and does drugs. Not unlike Snyder, he doesn't strike me as a visionary filmmaker that's going to do something particularly important, or even good without a lot of assistance from others. But, he's got some good filmmaking qualities obviously that first attracted the execs to go after him for this.I'm not seeing any conclusive proof that it was a simple matter of Trank turning in a finished cut that was supposedly decent and then Fox orchestrated reshoots after the fact. Sure Trank alone claimed that, though even he isn't standing by such a claim as he quickly rescinded his comment. You don't get fired from your next gig for being awesome. Something was up with him and him alone. Yes many directors are difficult but only proven successes actually get away with it (unless the movie has a tiny budget and the studio doesn't think it's worth a fight.)
Fox: "You're new to the Singerverse right Trank?"
"Yes..."
"So what makes you think the slack I cut Singer in any way translates to you?"
*gulp*
Anyways, I just got back from this cinematic version of a hooker on an abortion table.
I will say this, Tim Story's F4 movies are masterpieces compared to this.
They might've **** on the source material and had a not so great Reed, Sue and Doom plus a human size Thing but at least there was an element of a fun and energetic family dynamic with some pretty decent action, a comic book come to life.
This movie was made by someone who had no business trying to emulate a great like Cronenberg in writing, directing and character study.
You could tell it was made by someone who thought they were being a genius when in reality they were outputting grade school drama.
Directing/Writing is much more than just talking about a great idea and vision with cinematic history being thrown around trying to sound all smart, any ***** can talk big.
Filmmaking is about working with hundreds of people simultaneously from dozens of departments to bring that vision to life, empowering others with your confidence and gaining their respect and trust thru a collabrative process starting at the top all the way to the bottom.
The second the departments lose faith in their director they're immediately going to the producers to complain and the snow ball starts there.
Trank is a little kid driving a car on the LA freeway, **** is going to go bad quick!
The build up in this movie, the first "quality" hour, was even worse than what Tim Story gave us, because at least Tim Story was mature enough to follow thru all the way to the end with his build up.
Don't even get me started on the so called superhero action. It made no ****ing sense!
This movie is a 1/10.
Nah, **** that, 0/10.
I would stand in Times Square naked with a sign that said "Godzilla is Coming, We're All Doomed!" before I ever watch this movie again.
I'm not seeing any conclusive proof that it was a simple matter of Trank turning in a finished cut that was supposedly decent and then Fox orchestrated reshoots after the fact. Sure Trank alone claimed that, though even he isn't standing by such a claim as he quickly rescinded his comment. You don't get fired from your next gig for being awesome. Something was up with him and him alone. Yes many directors are difficult but only proven successes actually get away with it (unless the movie has a tiny budget and the studio doesn't think it's worth a fight.)
Fox: "You're new to the Singerverse right Trank?"
"Yes..."
"So what makes you think the slack I cut Singer in any way translates to you?"
*gulp*
You can't be serious, or you know nothing about studios, and movie history.A studio doesn't order reshooting if the original product was good
People keep bringing up Alien 3 but Fincher STILL managed a final theatrical product that was good in it's own way (if you can forgive the early deaths of Hicks and Newt.) Thunderdome was all over the place with multiple directors and it's still entertaining. Lucas was furious about studio interference on American Graffiti and that movie STILL is a ****ing classic. The MPAA forced Verhoeven to add extra comedic news broadcasts to soften the hardcore nature of RoboCop and he turned those scenes into some of the film's most iconic moments.
If directors stay the course and play by the rules they can still turn out decent (or even good to great) films.
Trank had is story good or not, he shot it, then they rewrote and reshoot.If the story is good with solid writing usually you can't go wrong.
This might be the best review you've ever written.
Told ya you should have seen MI5, Jye.
So which was worse: This....or Spirit of Vengeance?
Also, a question to those poor *******s who paid to see this abomination:
How the **** Susan got her powers? Was there any explanation at all?
Could I simply miss something as important or is it just another rewrite/reshoot issue?
This!
I **** you not Chap, at least those ******** brothers completed their grand vision of GR taking a piss of fire.
Enter your email address to join: