Favorite film with an open/ambiguous ending?

[devilof76]

What was wrong with the Salvation ending?

Like the rest of the movie, it sucked.

Ends with the notion it's getting a sequel. When thankfully, it isnt.

Was that why? I thought it was because it sucked.

Actually.. it is.

May/June 2010



Bale signed on to star in 3 Terminator movies. So at the very least.. he'll be in them. And it appears McG will be back as well. Sorry for the bad news.

God. Dammit.

Gorramit.

 

[DinoLast]

Another one is The Wrestler.
Which was a great ending too

 

[Biojex]

Another one is The Wrestler.
Which was a great ending too

 

[Devil_666]

Pandorum

It was supposed to be the first of a three part series. The second movie would've been a prequel and the third a proper sequel. But since the first movie bombed so badly (33 million dollar budget and it only grossed 10 million domestically and 19 million worldwide) all plans for further movies were scrapped.

 

[Biojex]

sadness, I haven't seen it (which obviously didn't help the film ) was it any good?

 

[Devil_666]

5/10 Worth a single watch.

 

[Biojex]

ah...that's about how it looked

 

[Morbach]

The Boondock Saints and The House Of The Devil have good endings. Let's not forget the original Halloween.

 

[Maglor]

Like the rest of the movie, it sucked.

Because it lacked Arnold?


I dunno, I think people are comparing it to the first two Terminator's too much (I'm ignoring T:3). It's really a different kind of film. Really feels like a stand alone move. And I think as such it works quite well.

 

[Devil_666]

Because it lacked Arnold?

Guarantee it's not that because the third film HAD Arnold and absolutely sucked.

 

[Maglor]

Well not exactly...

 

[Devil_666]

Yeah ok.

 

[Maglor]

Wasn't Arnold just a CG image? I mean he wasn't really a character in the movie. Am I wrong?

 

[Devil_666]

Wasn't Arnold just a CG image? I mean he wasn't really a character in the movie. Am I wrong?

In the Third movie!?

 

[Maglor]

Ah, I see the confusion now.

Because it lacked Arnold?


I dunno, I think people are comparing it to the first two Terminator's too much (I'm ignoring T:3). It's really a different kind of film. Really feels like a stand alone move. And I think as such it works quite well.

I have only been referring to Salvation. Arnold was only CG in that at the very end.

 

[hairlesswookiee]

Pandorum

It was supposed to be the first of a three part series. The second movie would've been a prequel and the third a proper sequel. But since the first movie bombed so badly (33 million dollar budget and it only grossed 10 million domestically and 19 million worldwide) all plans for further movies were scrapped.

Yeah I didn't really like it. Maybe it was me, but it felt like they were trying too hard to be like Event Horizon with a twist ending.

 

[fawk3s]

Saw

Did Dr. Gordon survive? Will he be the new accomplice? We will find out in the final installment.

 

[Devil_666]

Saw!? It had a sequel(s) that explained every question you asked fawk3s.

 

[CelticPredator]

Because it lacked Arnold?


I dunno, I think people are comparing it to the first two Terminator's too much (I'm ignoring T:3). It's really a different kind of film. Really feels like a stand alone move. And I think as such it works quite well.

Because it has no soul, or emotion. The characters suck. Batman shouldnt have been in that movie. If only they got Christian Bale, the movie would've been good. But no...I dont know why people picked Batman to play John Connor.

Also, it showed that the machines werent really that much of a threat. Thanks to the nice PG-13 rating. Only to sell toys.....and did those toys sell?

 

[plasmid303]

Neither T3 nor Salvation had ambiguous endings.

...unless you take the career of Nick Stahl into consideration.