Voorhees27
Super Freak
Nam can be a little rough around the edges and insulting but you just need to know the guy. He's also usually right about 99% of the time. Just saying.
Nam can be a little rough around the edges and insulting but you just need to know the guy. He's also usually right about 99% of the time. Just saying.
Well then he needs a visit from Miss Manners
I'll visit her as soon as you end your vacation in Neverneverland and come back to reality.
Well I just got back so it's time to start your classes.
Nam can be a little rough around the edges and insulting but you just need to know the guy. He's also usually right about 99% of the time. Just saying.
I'll visit her as soon as you end your vacation in Neverneverland and come back to reality.
Nam can be a little rough around the edges and insulting but you just need to know the guy. He's also usually right about 99% of the time. Just saying.
Somehow, I kinda doubt that.
What's a 99% accuracy rate in your world ? He's wrong quite often as was the case of him telling us we were trolling just because we had an opinion on a statue that we own ourselves as well. We never said it wasn't faithful to the source material like he claimed. There's no bigger troll than NAM on this board going from thread to thread all day picking on people's opinions. Just look in the Batman and Alice threads for his BS.
If this isn't trolling and looking for a reaction, I don't know what is...
I agree, the above quote is definitely trolling. Clearly you don't read my post history whatsoever, but won't hesitate to utilize the same "labeling" you're condemning. Hypocritical much?
Another huge stretch of posts debating nam's troll factor? AGAIN?!?
That's the problem, we do read your posts and it's quite clear that you're a huge troll. See Barbs post below. By the way, your mom says hi Now THAT's trolling, so get it right next time before accusing me.
Funny, I don't think I've ever made comments about one's family. Ever. Guess I don't fit your definition.
Though, I will say, stating that someone's opinion about the Jason PF is incorrect because it isn't one of Sideshow's best PFs this year, and pedestaling something like this in comparison:
Especially considering this is the Jason PF thread, is absolutely tantamount to trolling, given you're eliciting a negative response by negating someone's opinion of a piece. Or are we now gonna pretend you never did that and I'm making this up?
Back on topic please... first warning.
Lock it up--Shut 'er down, Lonnie. Because this is most likely going to continue.
Enter your email address to join: