BurningRage
Super Freak
MJ beat the Monstars.
Long time golden state warrior fan here. Steven curry is probably the best player ever.
Michael Jordan could play in any league, any era, any rules. I can't confidently say that about many players. Saying different rules/eras/planets/alternate universes etc is just a cop out...
Heck there's even video of MJ playing in the 1920's as the first black Harlem Globetrotter...
https://sportsmockery.com/2015/09/the-first-black-harlem-globetrotter-sweet-river-baines-video/
Exactly.....the bigger cop out is making statements that'll never be proven X player could play in any era and dominate versus taking actual factual information. But to each their own....
MJ beat the Monstars.
Nah...I'm pretty sure Jordan could do it
Exactly.....the bigger cop out is making statements that'll never be proven X player could play in any era and dominate versus taking actual factual information. But to each their own....
I enjoy your gusto HulkCollector....Curry would bury many of the "greatest" "GOAT" in a shooting contest for certain....
Long time golden state warrior fan here. Steven curry is probably the best player ever.
I honestly don't get the "Player X wouldn't be successful in Era Y" argument, especially if the player in question is a great player. If a player can shoot the ball with accuracy, that skill will translate across eras. If a player can play great individual defense, that skill will translate across eras. If a player has a high basketball IQ and court vision, that skill will translate.
The silliest argument I hear in other sports forums is that "Oh Lebron, would never be as successful as he is now in the 80's". BS I say. Does he look around for a call anytime he gets touched? Yes...but so does every other player in the game. Like the saying goes, "Don't hate the player, hate the game". This is how the NBA is reffed now, and players have adjusted accordingly, and expect calls.
The other fallacy to that argument is that it ignores that any player wouldn't adjust his game accordingly. So the argument is that Lebron gets magically transported to the late 80's and plays against the Bad Boys, and all of the sudden he's not smart enough to change or adjust his game to that style of play? Doesn't make sense to me.
The only players I could see have trouble adjusting are 80's era big men suddenly playing now, because it is a guard's league.
And maybe James Harden, LOL. When his shot is on, it's deadly, but his game is predicated so much on drawing fouls (which IS a basketball skill in today's NBA).
As a long time GSW fan, shouldn't you know the correct spelling of Curry's name by now?
Uhh I just double checked, not that i needed to and it's spelled curry.
Hakeem was awesome. More of a finesse big man. His dream shake and drive to the basket/ball fake was so incredible that a POINT GUARD, Rajon Rondo, imitated it 10-15 years later.
It took a while for me to accept the change in the NBA. Growing up and watching the NBA in the 80's/early 90's, it was ingrained that you played inside out and needed a dominant big man, and that a "jump shooting team would never win a title". Things change, LOL.
This is funny because this guy isn't even as good as our second best player clay.
I've watched ALOT of basketball over the last three years and I don't get the hype on this guy. Clay Thompson any day any night and he's our second option.
This is funny because this guy isn't even as good as our second best player clay.
I've watched ALOT of basketball over the last three years and I don't get the hype on this guy. Clay Thompson any day any night and he's our second option.
Enter your email address to join: