Exactly my point. Some will lap this up no matter what the quality is simply because it's a NEW Ghostbusters film. It could be the most brain dead piece of drivel ever and will still have its fair share of fans. Still, how much crappier can it be than the "mood slime" from part 2?
Ghostbusters 3
- Thread starter Batty
- Start date
Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:
uscmhicks
Super Freak
Even if this is crap compared to the others ( which it probably will be ) I will find something I like about it. Thats the best thing to do with crappy reboots.
Look for the positive things and if there isn't any forget it ever happened.
Thats how I do it anyway. No movie based on classic flicks can be worse tha avp-r.
Look for the positive things and if there isn't any forget it ever happened.
Thats how I do it anyway. No movie based on classic flicks can be worse tha avp-r.
Here's a good interview with Harold Ramis. It sounds like there still isn't a solid story yet.
<iframe src="https://makingof.com/embed/9b04d152845ec0a378394003c96da594" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" width="448" height="252"></iframe>
<iframe src="https://makingof.com/embed/9b04d152845ec0a378394003c96da594" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" width="448" height="252"></iframe>
Bill Murray doesn't sound convinced this is going to happen.
<object width="660" height="405"><param name="movie" value="https://www.youtube.com/v/Zj87DvlABHk&hl=en&fs=1&rel=0&color1=0x3a3a3a&color2=0x999999&border=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="https://www.youtube.com/v/Zj87DvlABHk&hl=en&fs=1&rel=0&color1=0x3a3a3a&color2=0x999999&border=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="660" height="405"></embed></object>
<object width="660" height="405"><param name="movie" value="https://www.youtube.com/v/Zj87DvlABHk&hl=en&fs=1&rel=0&color1=0x3a3a3a&color2=0x999999&border=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="https://www.youtube.com/v/Zj87DvlABHk&hl=en&fs=1&rel=0&color1=0x3a3a3a&color2=0x999999&border=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="660" height="405"></embed></object>
Voorhees27
Super Freak
I wise man once told me that anything posted on Youtube is fake! So this is a fake too, thats not reall Murray.
I wise man once told me that anything posted on Youtube is fake! So this is a fake too, thats not reall Murray.
Yeah, but that wise man doesn't know anything.
Well,
Ramis, Aykroyd and Reitman have said they have the script... they probably are reviewing it before sending it to Murray...
but, I agree with Bill: "I'll believe it when I see it!"
Ramis, Aykroyd and Reitman have said they have the script... they probably are reviewing it before sending it to Murray...
but, I agree with Bill: "I'll believe it when I see it!"
Deckard
Super Freak
Its my understanding that everyone discussed the plot and agreed to the idea. But not to doing the movie. They all just like the concept.
Now that concept is being put into script. The only people in the know about the script itself are Aykroyd, Ramis, and the writers. Once thats finished and they like what they have, they'll goto Bill and Ernie and get them on board too.
I like that Bill is still taking this attitude, because it forces the writers to really focus on the story, and tbh, having recently gotten into The Office reruns, I am more optimistic then ever, they are stepping in the right direction.
But anyone who thinks this is already a total go, is nuts.
Now that concept is being put into script. The only people in the know about the script itself are Aykroyd, Ramis, and the writers. Once thats finished and they like what they have, they'll goto Bill and Ernie and get them on board too.
I like that Bill is still taking this attitude, because it forces the writers to really focus on the story, and tbh, having recently gotten into The Office reruns, I am more optimistic then ever, they are stepping in the right direction.
But anyone who thinks this is already a total go, is nuts.
Batfreak
Super Freak
- Joined
- Dec 21, 2008
- Messages
- 1,373
- Reaction score
- 0
man he is looking more jewish by the day!
So, how about all these rumors, Murray speaking:
https://www.mailonsunday.co.uk/home...ctors-high-salaries-travel-trouble-known.html
And this (POSSIBLE SPOILER ALERT):
https://www.cinematical.com/2010/02/08/ghostbusters-3-news-murray-confirms-rumors-possible-villain/
https://www.mailonsunday.co.uk/home...ctors-high-salaries-travel-trouble-known.html
And this (POSSIBLE SPOILER ALERT):
https://www.cinematical.com/2010/02/08/ghostbusters-3-news-murray-confirms-rumors-possible-villain/
'Ghostbusters 3' News: Murray Confirms Rumors, Possible Villain Revealed?
by Erik Davis Feb 8th 2010 // 12:32PM
As the writers slave over another draft of the Ghostbusters 3 script -- with production hopefully beginning later this year -- some more news regarding the film's storyline has slipped out across these internets, with one aspect being an exclusive to Cinematical.
Possible spoilers for Ghostbusters 3 to follow ...
First up is the news that Bill Murray has confirmed his other-worldly role in the film. A few months back, Sigourney Weaver had let slip that Murray was going to be playing a ghost in the film -- a rumor that was later squashed by folks who claimed that particular storyline was featured in a very old draft. However, Murray has now gone on record as not only disliking the second Ghostbusters movie (something he's said before) and thinking that Groundhog Day should've been a bigger hit, but also noting that he would only return to the Ghostbusters franchise if they made his character a ghost. He says, "I said to them, 'I'll do it if you kill me off in the first reel.' So now they are going to have me as a ghost in the film." Murray as a ghost? I hope it works. What do you think?
Meanwhile, as most talk revolves around the returning actors and the identity of the new recruits, little has been said about the film's mythology and who (or what) the Ghostbusters will be battling this time around. Well, Cinematical has it on very good authority that as recent as this past summer, the central mythology of the sequel was being based on Zoroastrianism, which is one of the earliest religions on record. Like with most religions, the war between good and evil is at its central core, and in terms of evil there's Ahriman: the god of darkness, the eternal destroyer of good, personification and creator of evil, bringer of death and disease.
Is Ahriman the film's villain?
Unfortunately, we cannot confirm that Ahriman is or isn't the villain, but if the writers are still working with Zoroastrianism as the basis for the film's mythology, then it would make sense that Ahriman would play a big role in unleashing evil spirits into our world, much like Gozer did in the first film. Ahriman also existed as a character in Highlander: The Series, where it was said that the demon returned to Earth every thousand years to wreak havoc. Like we said before, this is all speculation based on the news that Ghostbusters 3 will revolve in some way around the ancient religion of Zoroastrianism. Of course, as we hear more, we'll let you know.
by Erik Davis Feb 8th 2010 // 12:32PM
As the writers slave over another draft of the Ghostbusters 3 script -- with production hopefully beginning later this year -- some more news regarding the film's storyline has slipped out across these internets, with one aspect being an exclusive to Cinematical.
Possible spoilers for Ghostbusters 3 to follow ...
First up is the news that Bill Murray has confirmed his other-worldly role in the film. A few months back, Sigourney Weaver had let slip that Murray was going to be playing a ghost in the film -- a rumor that was later squashed by folks who claimed that particular storyline was featured in a very old draft. However, Murray has now gone on record as not only disliking the second Ghostbusters movie (something he's said before) and thinking that Groundhog Day should've been a bigger hit, but also noting that he would only return to the Ghostbusters franchise if they made his character a ghost. He says, "I said to them, 'I'll do it if you kill me off in the first reel.' So now they are going to have me as a ghost in the film." Murray as a ghost? I hope it works. What do you think?
Meanwhile, as most talk revolves around the returning actors and the identity of the new recruits, little has been said about the film's mythology and who (or what) the Ghostbusters will be battling this time around. Well, Cinematical has it on very good authority that as recent as this past summer, the central mythology of the sequel was being based on Zoroastrianism, which is one of the earliest religions on record. Like with most religions, the war between good and evil is at its central core, and in terms of evil there's Ahriman: the god of darkness, the eternal destroyer of good, personification and creator of evil, bringer of death and disease.
Is Ahriman the film's villain?
Unfortunately, we cannot confirm that Ahriman is or isn't the villain, but if the writers are still working with Zoroastrianism as the basis for the film's mythology, then it would make sense that Ahriman would play a big role in unleashing evil spirits into our world, much like Gozer did in the first film. Ahriman also existed as a character in Highlander: The Series, where it was said that the demon returned to Earth every thousand years to wreak havoc. Like we said before, this is all speculation based on the news that Ghostbusters 3 will revolve in some way around the ancient religion of Zoroastrianism. Of course, as we hear more, we'll let you know.
Darth Madden
You Are A Tooooooy!!!
Bill would be cool ghost.
tylerdurden
Super Freak
hope this turns out good.
building the story and antagonist around
sounds quite intriguing.
i'm game if all the principle cast members and the humour from the 1st film are back.
building the story and antagonist around
zoroastrianism
i'm game if all the principle cast members and the humour from the 1st film are back.
sladesuperagent
Mine's bigger.
This is not happening...again.
https://www.cinemablend.com/new/Bill-Murray-Calls-Ghostbusters-3-Hogwash-And-A-Myth-18299.html
https://www.cinemablend.com/new/Bill-Murray-Calls-Ghostbusters-3-Hogwash-And-A-Myth-18299.html
Thank god, i love the GB's but i think a 3rd film is a major bad idea, if it fails to live up to the hype do we really want to be left like the indy fans felt after KotCS? its cool to do games now and then but keep the films as those two. im dreading the inveitable remake.
Honestly I'm sick of Bill's B.S. if you don't have anything to say, STFU!!!
I'm very skeptical when it comes to re-vamps/re-makes/20y.o. sequels... but this is the GB!!!
I want more GB!!!
!!!
I'm very skeptical when it comes to re-vamps/re-makes/20y.o. sequels... but this is the GB!!!
I want more GB!!!
!!!
hairlesswookiee
PALPATINE CRUSADER!!!!
I'd love a third movie, but only if EVERYONE is on board and backing it 100%. Last year's game was OK, but nothing more than just another game....the gameplay was nothing new, and the story was nothing spectacular.
RJMacReady16
Super Freak
They definitely need a 3rd one to kick off a new franchise.
Bill Murray has gotten kind of annoying since becoming an "act-or". Shocked he even appeared in Zombieland. He needs to shut his yap and dance like the bo-jangles he is.
Dance for my amusement!
Bill Murray has gotten kind of annoying since becoming an "act-or". Shocked he even appeared in Zombieland. He needs to shut his yap and dance like the bo-jangles he is.
Dance for my amusement!
Maybe one day, i just hope they dont just do it for money or just because its what the studio wants. If they are going to do a 3rd i hope its becuase they want to come back and make the best film they possibly can. maybe Ackroyd can make up for that cameo he did in casper....i wept.
Similar threads
