I agree, I have both 95 kits Image did and they are excellent. I also have this 89 Image kit that is one of my favs. Need to build them one dayI always felt the resin image kit was the most accurate
View attachment 188973
I always felt the resin image kit was the most accurate
View attachment 188973
Just received my 91 Sakai today.
There are tiny paint chips on many areas of the figure..and on the nose area there is some mold flash and uneven paint.
My 89 30cm also have some very minor paint issue, but the 91 sakai is really not acceptable for me as a $200+ figure..especially the paint scheme is so simple!
I am done with X-plus...was contemplating the new burning when I saw the release this morning but after unboxing the Sakai and seeing the QC problem, I'm really disappointed. Nevertheless, the sculpt is bloody fantastic.
I agree, I have both 95 kits Image did and they are excellent. I also have this 89 Image kit that is one of my favs. Need to build them one day
Yeah I love my 20cm version. Never did buy the 30cm version. Really should have.
That is so unusual ... I have NEVER ( so far) had any problems with an xplus godzilla ... I always expect to since I'm also a neca collector, so I've been beaten into that mindset,
but xplus, kotobukiya, bandai ( japan), kaiyodo ( except their she T boxes)....I've never had paint problems with....
The 30-cm one definitely stands out imo. I did see a quick glimpse of your 20cm when you posted your collection online. Should post a dedicated picture of it in the future. I'm sure it's excellent.
Need some better looks of that face. It looks super bandai-ish in that picture.
Enter your email address to join: