Calling it a suicide is jumping to conclusions as well, because that implies and assumes premeditation and that he took this concoction of prescribed meds in order to purposely kill himself.
True, no one will ever know what he was thinking at the time and what his intentions were (or weren't). But using Occam's Razor to call it an "accidental overdose" is actually the more rational conclusion.
exactly my point, but IN MY OPINION, anyone who takes 6 different meds or whatever the "official" number is, CLEARLY has some major issues. If he didnt die from that, I'd say he was a freak of nature. wouldnt you agree?
How is an "accidental overdose" more rational than suicide? they both start and end at the same place....which is, WE WILL NEVER KNOW FOR SURE. Is it rational because it's the "credible" thing to say?