I?m in a grimy workshop right now so good photos are out of the question, but first impressions:
- If you have recent diecast releases you already have a good idea of the overall feel and quality.
- Impressive bulk.
- Somewhat stylized, ?heroic? proportions but we all knew that. This is the closest to ?man-in-a-suit we?ve got thanks to that bulk. Just don?t think too hard on the long legs, which is where like every other armour, it looks most stylized upon close scrutiny; but so did the film models.
- Those shoulder/back pieces everyone has mentioned? Yeah, they come off if you look at them funny. Not the worst flaw this could have but annoying.
Now where it really wins is paint.
- Finish is closest to the more matte look we see on-screen. It?s kind of a dull satin and what I would call a muted cherry hue. The silver and gold are well-rendered and integrate nicely.
- Weathering is subtle and realistic.
- The paint has depth and exhibits subtle gradients in natural light. Very impressive and less ?toy? - like.
Due to the bulk and paint I think this will integrate into 1/6 displays with other characters better. It has a feel that?s just incrementally more realistic.
Is it ?the best? .. ? That?s a touch subjective but it does have better paint and proportions. Not exponentially better, but still a tiny step closer. Recent diecast releases have for the most part been exceptional so there?s no true game changer here besides the paint.
As reviewers have said, the battle damage is maybe a touch soft but nothing you?ll hate.
No filters or adjustment, daylight from a nearby window, some minor iPhone lens distortion:
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk