If you guys think the eyes look different, that's ashame because that was the one part of the sculpt that looked like Ford.
To Indy or not to Indy
If you guys think the eyes look different, that's ashame because that was the one part of the sculpt that looked like Ford.
I don't see how anyone can make this out from that pic, but whatever. The hat does look different to me, but that annoying reflection in the glass kind of obscures it. It appears as if the brim is closer to the top of his ear. It also looks like the crown of the hat is not as tall. Again, this could all simply be the angle at which the photo was taken though.
My money is on these still being the same protos we have seen before. If they were new sculpts, you'd think more people would have taken pictures of them. Then again, like someone said, Indy does seem like the red-headed step child that no one wants to acknowledge.
My money is on these still being the same protos we have seen before.
I would opt for NOT to Indy...the Colts are just not the same without Manning!
Hate those who posting such a crappy pics.
This has got to be the most infamous Hot Toys release of all time.
This has got to be the most infamous Hot Toys release of all time.
Damn, was that pic taken in 1981? Looks like a 0.25 megapixel camera.
Anyway, after enlarging it and tweaking the picture to compare to the older pics (and degrading the older pic,) it does to me look like a tweaked sculpt, though it's obviously the worst photo ever taken so hard to be sure.
Face doesn't look as long and the mouth/jaw looks slightly different (though it might just be the collar on the older pic.) Again, hard to say for sure and angles can be deceiving. Photoshop might be able to get more out of the new pic.
I did some tweaking to the photo too. Still a bit hard to tell.
I did some tweaking to the photo too. Still a bit hard to tell.