Hot Toys DX09 - BATMAN - Batman (Michael Keaton) - Specs & Pics

[thenammagazine]

Hmmm I kinda see what your saying. Its not the best picture to tell for sure though. If thats the case,why would they do that? Why not do it like the DX02? Just have the whole cowl come off and one of those thingymajigs to move the eyes. I dunno.

Yup. What looks like the panel kinda looks like a face-down "D" on the back. Honestly, I could care less either way though as I don't intend to display Batman facing the wall.

 

[Platty]

Stupid PIERS!

You win. At life.

 

[jye4ever]

Yup. What looks like the panel kinda looks like a face-down "D" on the back. Honestly, I could care less either way though as I don't intend to display Batman facing the wall.

No Blair Witch Batman pose for me either

 

[TheFiend]

Yup. What looks like the panel kinda looks like a face-down "D" on the back. Honestly, I could care less either way though as I don't intend to display Batman facing the wall.

Yeah there is too much good with this figure to worry about a panel in the back

 

[Guinnessfan]

Yeah there is too much good with this figure to worry about a panel in the back

 

[amusedjester]

I hope you're wrong about the panel at the back, nam. I want that cowl with clean lines. If it can be seen in a blurry photo, it will probably be worse on hand. PERS access should be at the neck bottom.

 

[Maglor]

I highly doubt there will be a panel at the back. I fully expect the same design as the DX02.

No Blair Witch Batman pose for me either

 

[VintijDroidGutzz]

It isn't clear in that photo one way or the other really, but I was just wondering about it, that's all. As mentioned though, it'll likely be more than fine.

I've got no figures with PERS, so I'm not up on the general MO for past releases - except for the ones with hair pieces that you remove.. I've seen those demoed in online reviews, etc.

 

[intothevoid]

That pic is too unclear to prove anything either way - really hope for access from underneath though.

And why don't HT ever show back of the head pics
With the DX series at least it should be made clear at PO stage where the access is from.

 

[VintijDroidGutzz]

Yeah, it'd be nice to see the mechanism / design beforehand with these masked characters - regardless of past examples.. they may not all be the same going forward.

 

[jye4ever]

That pic is too unclear to prove anything either way - really hope for access from underneath though.

And why don't HT ever show back of the head pics
With the DX series at least it should be made clear at PO stage where the access is from.

Men have the best PERS stick

Imagine if HT made it that way

We would have to drop our toys knickers to move the eyes left and right

Wifey is saying my mind is always in the gutter

 

[intothevoid]

 

[Rex Mason]

Anybody else hoping that we get a chamber to house the bat-suit now that Tony Stark's getting his own armory? I'd love the one used in the 89 film, or even the one from Dark Knight...

(My apologies if someone has mentioned this before. I'm a little behind on this particular thread.)

 

[intothevoid]

I think both are likely after seeing the Iron Man hall of armour, and yes, it has been discussed before

 

[DiFabio]

Anybody else hoping that we get a chamber to house the bat-suit now that Tony Stark's getting his own armory? I'd love the one used in the 89 film, or even the one from Dark Knight...

(My apologies if someone has mentioned this before. I'm a little behind on this particular thread.)

It was mentioned by some *** hat who doesn't know what he's talking about a few pages back. It's alright to bring it up again, it's a good idea.

After seeing that great Iron Man Hall of Armor I want an '89 vault.

They're upping their game so I'd definitely be interested in an '89 vault and a TDK armory cage. They seem like no brainers.

Oh and I'm in the camp who doesn't think that that is a panel in the back of the figure's head for the PERS. I'm thinking that 1. It's a bad shot of the back of the head and 2. it's the shadows of the sculpt. If it is a seam it certainly better not be!

DO YOU HEAR ME HOT TOYS, NO PERS PANELS OR SEAMS ON THE BACK OF THE HEAD!


There's no reason that they can't hide it like they did with the DX 02. Unless of course that's why the DX 02's biceps and abs leaked, because of the PERS being under the head.

 

[IrishJedi]

There's no panel in the back of the head.

 

[TheFiend]

Anybody else hoping that we get a chamber to house the bat-suit now that Tony Stark's getting his own armory? I'd love the one used in the 89 film, or even the one from Dark Knight...

(My apologies if someone has mentioned this before. I'm a little behind on this particular thread.)

The chamber was bad ***! That would be awesome. Wasnt it Returns where he had a bunch of batsuits on hanger in (i guess) a closet sort of thing? Yeah he actually pushed back like 4 or 5 of them and grabbed one in the middle They're all the SAME!

 

[jye4ever]

The chamber was bad ***! That would be awesome. Wasnt it Returns where he had a bunch of batsuits on hanger in (i guess) a closet sort of thing? Yeah he actually pushed back like 4 or 5 of them and grabbed on in the middle They're all the SAME!

 

[Rex Mason]

The chamber was bad ***! That would be awesome. Wasnt it Returns where he had a bunch of batsuits on hanger in (i guess) a closet sort of thing? Yeah he actually pushed back like 4 or 5 of them and grabbed on in the middle They're all the SAME!

Yeah, I loved that scene and how it contrasted Bruce and Selina getting into costume. Great stuff.

So as long as we're dreaming of the bat-chamber, let's throw in an Alfred to go along with it...

 

[EVILFACE]

If anything, would be kewl if the box was done like this.