Now, I realize that's one interpretation, and I do enjoy it but I prefer the '89 version myself. To me the Batman/Bruce Wayne character is dark and brooding, an outcast. He's not a sane guy because his parents were gunned down in front of him. He fights crime because his parents were murdered and he hasn't and will never recover from it. His ideals and view of justice IS Batman, that's why he created it. Batman isn't a mask, it's who Bruce Wayne is. He has no friends, he wants no friends. His only ally is Alfred. He doesn't care if he has a life other than Batman and would rather patrol the mean streets instead of helping fund a Harvey Dent political rally. He refers to himself in the first person, not third because he IS Batman. He's so obsessed with crime he has countless monitors surveillance his home and Gotham. In his spare time he doesn't even bother with his alterego's public image he just sits in his gigantic mansion waiting to be needed, waiting for the signal to go up and brooding about how he's the only one that can make a difference, cause, well he's Batman.
To sum it up, my favorite interpretation of Batman is one that subconsciously desires Gotham to still be filled with crime just so he has a function in society. To me, that's pretty complex ____. Much better than becoming a symbol to inspire a city to take the reigns so he doesn't have to fight crime anymore. Batman should have a sickly, obsessive mind about eradicating crime, that's his mission.
Whiny, moral ___ that makes long speeches about cleaning up the city while yelling at punks < Stone cold, butt hurt vigilante that doesn't say a word but communicates through appearance alone, knows the city is a festering wound that will never heal, and will fight it anyway.
Nolan Batman is like a bleeding heart liberal while the Burton Batman has no political views. He's pissed and he's just ____ing Batman.
Don't witness your parents getting gunned down at the age of 8 folks.
I can't wait to see Year One.
Do any of u guys think this guy is gonna be a leaker?
I love how you trolls take bits and pieces of a discussion to use out of context.
Who's taking bits out the discussion? I read the last 20 pages. Your comment was the ONLY one that was derogatory toward a target audience.
Now, I realize that's one interpretation, and I do enjoy it but I prefer the '89 version myself. To me the Batman/Bruce Wayne character is dark and brooding, an outcast. He's not a sane guy because his parents were gunned down in front of him. He fights crime because his parents were murdered and he hasn't and will never recover from it. His ideals and view of justice IS Batman, that's why he created it. Batman isn't a mask, it's who Bruce Wayne is. He has no friends, he wants no friends. His only ally is Alfred. He doesn't care if he has a life other than Batman and would rather patrol the mean streets instead of helping fund a Harvey Dent political rally. He refers to himself in the first person, not third because he IS Batman. He's so obsessed with crime he has countless monitors surveillance his home and Gotham. In his spare time he doesn't even bother with his alterego's public image he just sits in his gigantic mansion waiting to be needed, waiting for the signal to go up and brooding about how he's the only one that can make a difference, cause, well he's Batman.
The ONLY problem I have with this that ANYONE could figure out who Batman is in Burton's film. It's obvious because Wayne is also dark and brooding in public. In Nolan's film it would be much more difficult to figure it out because Wayne doesn't fit the mold.
You mean the joke the quoted member completely got and you failed to understand? Brush up on your reading comprehension.
In Burton's film though, Wayne is a recluse. Invites to his party didn't even know who he was and the press didn't even know what he looked like.
I really wanna see Year One. I heard its gonna be released the same day as Arkham City but i dont see it anywhere for pre-order. Not on play.com or hmv or anything.
And that's the most ridiculous part. The press not knowing who a billionaire philanthropists is? One who lives in their own city? Please.
The ONLY problem I have with this that ANYONE could figure out who Batman is in Burton's film. It's obvious because Wayne is also dark and brooding in public. In Nolan's film it would be much more difficult to figure it out because Wayne doesn't fit the mold.
You know all the millionaire/billionaire philanthropists in your city? Honestly, this is part of what I meant when I posted earlier about that being a time when there weren't douchebags overthinking every aspect of a movie microscopically and could actually sit down and enjoy a movie for what it was. Today's films, aka Nolan's, have to be dumbed down to where every single aspect must be explained to the audience because they're incapable of getting lost in the fantasy.
Enter your email address to join: