^ Yes. You'll find many flaws in all stories if you're looking, but it's not about that. It's about entertainment. It's best not to dwell on the fine details.
he might know the construction but did not understand the functional bugs.
you see, it's not normal to pour tears in amount of crying. what's wrong with your eye-oil ducts, he asks according to your version. they should not leak that bad, let's fix them with some tape and glue
Yeah, that always got to me too. Another one, even a bigger one I think, is after John tells him he can't go around killing people he asks "Why?" I would think Skynet would at least try to keep a low profile if possible. It doesn't show of course with all the **** being blown up but you would think that would be basic. You don't kill people( outside a threat or target) in 1991 because its illegal etc.
Sent from my LG-E739 using Tapatalk 2
Of course, we can find these nits if we look for them. But Cameron said early on that you have to take a lot of the stuff in these things with a grain of salt. The fact is, he makes them realistic enough that the audience isn't sitting there questioning things constantly as the movie progresses. What happens makes sense in the universe that he has constructed. We come along for the ride, and enjoy it because the films are really masterfully crafted (T1 and T2, that is). But the most basic premise of T1 is pretty odd--you send an infiltration robot disguised as a human, yet have him look like Mr. Universe so that there is no way he would really go unnoticed. But it is for the good of the movie, so we roll with it.
The problem with movies like the Star Wars prequels is that the unnatural behaviors, logical inconsistencies, etc. work in such a way that viewers are taken out of the film and can't enjoy it. Cameron doesn't make that mistake.
It's actually $314.99 MSRP for both. Sideshow just advertised it as $304.99 + $10 flat fee shipping for the exclusive to make it look more enticing to buy from them I suppose
This part...But are you saying that some of the details of the actual endoskull are wrong?
but that part is not a wrong endoskeleton part, it's a wrong flesh wound shape
Scene recreations:
https://www.sideshowcollectors.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4679454&postcount=13648
https://www.sideshowcollectors.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4679459&postcount=13649
https://www.sideshowcollectors.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4679460&postcount=13650
https://www.sideshowcollectors.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4679464&postcount=13651
https://www.sideshowcollectors.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4679467&postcount=13652
https://www.sideshowcollectors.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4679471&postcount=13653
https://www.sideshowcollectors.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4679475&postcount=13654
https://www.sideshowcollectors.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4670846&postcount=13632
https://www.sideshowcollectors.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4670850&postcount=13633
Other than that though I love the look of the endoskull and the eye.
Original dio before I added my part to it: https://www.sideshowcollectors.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4032757&postcount=38
Scene recreations:
https://www.sideshowcollectors.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4679454&postcount=13648
https://www.sideshowcollectors.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4679459&postcount=13649
https://www.sideshowcollectors.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4679460&postcount=13650
https://www.sideshowcollectors.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4679464&postcount=13651
https://www.sideshowcollectors.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4679467&postcount=13652
https://www.sideshowcollectors.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4679471&postcount=13653
https://www.sideshowcollectors.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4679475&postcount=13654
https://www.sideshowcollectors.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4670846&postcount=13632
https://www.sideshowcollectors.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4670850&postcount=13633
well... after you put it that way, the alternate explanation really looks fake.I suppose 'whats wrong with your eyes?' could be interpreted as 'whats wrong with your tear ducts?', I dunno.
i see. i guess i'll have a blind spot for that place to ignore it )It's both. The piston for the jaw is the wrong shape and it's missing the sort of "C" shaped hinge thing.
The forehead damage isn't right...the same with most of the damage on that head. Does it look good? Sure, but I suppose that's arguable. Is it accurate? No.
It's both. The piston for the jaw is the wrong shape and it's missing the sort of "C" shaped hinge thing.
well... after you put it that way, the alternate explanation really looks fake.
if that was the case, he'd ask "why are your eyes pouring liquid too much", not "what's happening at all".
so you're right, and "i have detailed files on human anatomy" joined with "what's wrong with your eyes" is a bug/mistake.
i see. i guess i'll have a blind spot for that place to ignore it )
God, totally forgot about that, Andrew.
Still love it, just looked through it.
All the poses you recreated 100%.
Quality stuff right there...
Imagine if I shipped the whole lot to Maulfan for him to take his shots. I'd replace the MMS117 with DX10 though.
Imagine if I shipped the whole lot to Maulfan for him to take his shots. I'd replace the MMS117 with DX10 though.
That would be a lot of fun, and I appreciate the support of my photos, your sets show a very thorough recreation same as I'd approach it. If I get this HT figure, I will end up wishing I still had the others, no T-1000 fight shots, but still a grail figure.
That would be a lot of fun, and I appreciate the support of my photos, your sets show a very thorough recreation same as I'd approach it. If I get this HT figure, I will end up wishing I still had the others, no T-1000 fight shots, but still a grail figure.