highlander1
Super Freak
- Joined
- Jun 14, 2011
- Messages
- 6,373
- Reaction score
- 149
There's a few other type's but think could work well and most likely cheaper before hot toys include's one.
Absolutely. I hunted down your T1 pics again recently and reposted links in the MMS136 thread actually. Those were pretty definitive shots of that figure, and an exactness of posing from the film that I really loved and tried to go for with my Pescadero scenes. It was tough matching MMS117 up to the film though, the experience kinda lowered my opinion of that figure actually, and it was already lower than most other people's. It really looked off in the head and body.
well... after you put it that way, the alternate explanation really looks fake.
if that was the case, he'd ask "why are your eyes pouring liquid too much", not "what's happening at all".
so you're right, and "i have detailed files on human anatomy" joined with "what's wrong with your eyes" is a bug/mistake.
i see. i guess i'll have a blind spot for that place to ignore it )
Of course, we can find these nits if we look for them. But Cameron said early on that you have to take a lot of the stuff in these things with a grain of salt. The fact is, he makes them realistic enough that the audience isn't sitting there questioning things constantly as the movie progresses. What happens makes sense in the universe that he has constructed. We come along for the ride, and enjoy it because the films are really masterfully crafted (T1 and T2, that is). But the most basic premise of T1 is pretty odd--you send an infiltration robot disguised as a human, yet have him look like Mr. Universe so that there is no way he would really go unnoticed. But it is for the good of the movie, so we roll with it.
The problem with movies like the Star Wars prequels is that the unnatural behaviors, logical inconsistencies, etc. work in such a way that viewers are taken out of the film and can't enjoy it. Cameron doesn't make that mistake.
Thats pretty cool
Man - that's excellent!
It looks so well kept - I have concert tickets from the early 90s that have completely faded details & text.
Nice one.
That's why I was so impressed with the Enterbay figure, the head has a few issues, but overall, it's like looking at Arnie, I didn't have to compensate for anything wrong with it, I could just shoot it. MMS117 had it's good and bad angles and lighting, under the wrong conditions it looked pretty rough.
I think in the car he should have simply asked "why are you crying?" which is an embarrassing question to ask any 10 year old who's trying to be tough and John's silence would have been appropriate. Then he simply could have asked John again when they were fixing the truck just as it actually played out.
I know most of you don't like part 3 but if HT did Salvation figures then T3 deserves more. I would like to see T3 Arnold and TX to end my Terminator line How about a DX like that?
The damage the T-850 sustains in T3 is the only good part of the film. Yeah, it's CGI, but I liked seeing how FUBAR he was. The ****ing naked endo leg, the exposed arm. He looked like ****.
That would make a great figure.
And some folks had a problem with bad to the bone in T2? I forgot how awful his introduction was.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=inPijjFNNSI&feature=player_detailpage
t3 was bad but had some good parts....
I actually found T3 to be surprisingly entertaining when I first saw it but man did that feeling not last long. Anything Terminator related not directed by Cameron is just fan-fiction to me.