Seriously, Smith isn't a tenth the filmmaker Tim Burton is.
Agreed and I think he actually admits that during one of his commentaries haha
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Seriously, Smith isn't a tenth the filmmaker Tim Burton is.
Agreed,
Agreed,
But hopefully without that cut on his cheek.
Well,I can't see HT ever doing a Keaton Bruce Wayne.While I agree, I don't see why they would do it any differently than how he was in the movie though.
Well, there is a moment before Catwoman ***** slaps him where he doesn't have the scratch.
I'd prefer no blood, but I'd be cool with it either way. Look at Amazing Spider-Man. The wounds on the Peter Parker headsculpt would drive me nuts.
Well,I can't see HT ever doing a Keaton Bruce Wayne.
Including the head and leaving out the cut would give anybody that wants one the opportunity to bash one.
ha!That's the cut you meant? Sorry, I thought you were referring to the actual neck cut on the cowl (ripped)
It'll be the exc for DX15.
And they will reuse again the head for the Bruce Wayne in black turtle neck and jeans figure.
^^ That's where Steve Jobs got the idea for "his style"
Just more reason they should've included an unmasked Keaton head with the DX09, even though he never appears in the film with the suit on without the mask. It would've been a great way to get the "clean" Keaton headsculpt done, and then include the Catwoman-scratched unmasked head with the Batman Returns release to give people the maximum options. I doubt they'd include both a scratched and unscratched Keaton head with this one.
Besides, I'm of the opinion that all DXs should come with at least two headsculpts for what you're paying. Whether or not its a character that wears a mask (if no mask, just have an alternate look/expression on the second head).
I know people complained when the DX 09 didn't have a Bruce Wayne head, but honestly, I don't think that would have been appropriate since he's never fully unmasked in the film.
Enter your email address to join: