- Joined
- May 31, 2011
- Messages
- 19,883
- Reaction score
- 291
Agreed.
If that's the case, why make figures based on movies at all? Just let artists create all kinds of wacky characters with no basis in nostalgia, film, comics, or other geek media.I don't get why people buy based on what they see in a movie . No matter how crappy a movie is or how bad the character was, if the design was kick *** people should at least give it a try.
If that's the case, why make figures based on movies at all? Just let artists create all kinds of wacky characters with no basis in nostalgia, film, comics, or other geek media.
It's because those things I mention is what drives collecting behavior for these kinds of things. Not just something that looks "kick ***," though that certainly helps.
I agree to a certain extent. I'm not really a huge fan of Iron Monger and especially not Iron Whiplash from the movies (annoys me to no end that he lands for the final battle, then immediately makes himself vulnerable by removing his face plate), but the design is close enough to the comics that I'm fine plonking my money down for the IM1/2 'versions' of these characters (same with Mark IV or MILK WM).I don't get why people buy based on what they see in a movie . No matter how crappy a movie is or how bad the character was, if the design was kick *** people should at least give it a try.
Yes, totally interested in this, too, and wish we had more insight into the business side of 1:6 production (kinda surprised there don't seem to be any trade publications or sites that offer any info). Although I wouldn't make a bet one way or the other, I could see HT quietly dropping this fig and a bunch of other stuff from the IM3 line....I'd be really interested in seeing the sales numbers from this figure, if they do end up making him. It's been SO quiet on the IM3 figure front since the movie actually came out, I can't help but think that HT is seriously rethinking their strategy.
I agree to a certain extent. I'm not really a huge fan of Iron Monger and especially not Iron Whiplash from the movies (annoys me to no end that he lands for the final battle, then immediately makes himself vulnerable by removing his face plate), but the design is close enough to the comics that I'm fine plonking my money down for the IM1/2 'versions' of these characters (same with Mark IV or MILK WM).
Mandarin's not really a character I would've been interested in, regardless or how he was portrayed, but there is no getting past in my mind that it's Kingsley playing a joke of a villian in the movie. It's just too specific a human/character likeness from the movie and there's no way to mentally gloss over it, like there is with say Iron Whiplash.
No problem, there. Given how nicely HT did Loki's outfit and the general quality of their stuff, I have no doubt that Kingsley Mandarin would look amazing. The only problem I have is Kingsley was already a deviation from the comics (so I couldn't convince myself it was sort-of comics accurate) and his character is also a punk in the movie. I agree with kara -- if they release him, then they should embrace the campy aspect of it and include beer cans, etc. I think HT was expecting a badass villian, though.True. But what I'm trying to say is don't pre-judge before you see actual pics...
Yeah, that's a good point. He'd probably do very good business as an exclusive. Regardless, hope this figure happens for those that want him.This guy has exclusive written all over him now. I really wouldn't be surprised if we don't get him and then all of a sudden he ends up being a Toy Fairs exclusive one year. Personally, I really want him, so I hope they've done enough pre production on him that they sort of have to release him, and I do really hope he comes with the chair and a backdrop so that we can do the poster pose. I have no problem plunking my money down for him, and would still like the real Mandarin too, especially if he has the tats and a light up chest.
The Mandarin looked great but the movie absolutely shat on his character. If this actually sees production, I'll get it because it's the closest approximation of the Mandarin we'll see in the near future. At least Bane was still Bane at the end of Rises. LOL.
Kingsley’s true character? A clueless, cowering, dim-witted actor named Trevor.
It’s not that The Mandarin isn’t in the movie — it’s just that he’s not the character you think he is, which leads to one of the most unexpected twists in the mythology of any recent superhero saga. Instead we find out that Guy Pearce’s scientist-entrepreneur Aldrich Killian is the true mastermind, although in the Extremis graphic novel, he is merely a desperate scientist who commits suicide after selling the formula to a domestic terror group.
In Iron Man 3, the character gets to go full on Big Bad. “Ultimately we do give you the Mandarin, the real guy, but it’s Guy Pearce in the end with the big dragon tattooed on his chest,” Black says. “He says, ‘You don’t understand, I’ve been this guy since I was born. I’ve been embodying him in this [actor] that I’ve had proxying for me, but it’s really me.’”
Feige notes that every character in the movies — from Tony Stark to his various villains — has some degree of variation from the comics.
“There was a point where it becomes an extreme change,” Feige acknowledges. “It was nerve wracking.”
You know, its funny you bring up Bane. As much as I liked Tom Hardy's performance in Dark Knight Rises, Bane' depiction onscreen bothers me more than Kingsley's fake Mandarin. I really wanted the juicer Bane and really hated that they gave his origin to Talia. I thought Guy Pierce made a pretty decent Mandarin, if you look at the film in that sense. It all comes down to everyone's own personal OCD.
Anyone that doesn't want this figure is small in the pants.
I don't get why people buy based on what they see in a movie . No matter how crappy a movie is or how bad the character was, if the design was kick *** people should at least give it a try.
Enter your email address to join: