Skiman
Super Freak
Wake me whenever this hits across the pond.
And you do know that critics didnt hate it....
THIS IS my MOVIE!!!!!
Sorry for the outburst
Critics DID hate the movie, as opposed to us liking it.
Here are some critics shooting the movie down:
https://rawgraphics.blogspot.com/2010/07/raw-critics-predators-review.html
https://movies.msn.com/movies/movie-critic-reviews/predators.3/
https://ontheflix.com/2010/07/09/top-critics-gave-new-predators-movie-average-rating-reviews/
https://www.metacritic.com/movie/predators/critic-reviews
Rotten Tomatoes gives them a generous 63% out of 100% though: https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/10012256-predators/
I really liked Predators. Not better than 1 but better than 2 as I will never get over why Predator would be in a city as big as LA.
Correct. And there's multiple references during the film to the "heatwave" LA is suffering from at the time of the Predator's hunt. It's the combination of the gang warfare and excessive heat that draws him there.Attracted by the heat I read somewhere , or does it say it in the movie ?.
A busy city means with violence means more worthy prey to hunt.
I think that was the idea.
It's got a 63%, my point still stands. Critics didnt hate the film. Some did, but not enough to say they hated it overall.
Rottentomatoes doesn't go by what critics actually rated it. Only by who liked and who didn't.
The actual rating is usually lower than the "like" rating. In this case, 5.8/10.
That would be an "F" by American standards.
Every time a critic gives bad reviews about a movie, that film ends up being a great movie. Lol
Um...no. 63% is still passing. It's not an F.
Enter your email address to join: