ProgMatinee
circlesendwheretheybegin
I think that is where the frustration kicks in. You and TheJosh are right, of course, in that there is a noticeable price difference, but when something like Snake Eyes only costs $30 or so less than what you could pay for something of Hot Toys quality, then the extra cost really doesn't seem so great, and then people like agent5 (and myself) have to debate if Sideshow is really worth the price anymore.
This is actually one component of an psychological theory called "prospect theory." Once you have already seriously considered paying a certain, high amount for something, it is pretty easy to justify paying more (even if it is a fair amount higher) for something similar but nicer, than if you hadn't already considered buying the cheaper thing.
Wal-Mart is very effective at exploiting this phenomenon, if you see their dirt cheap TVs being displayed right near the better quality, but more expensive ones, and even better quality, even more expensive ones right next to that. When people see this, they often get the more expensive one, even if they went to the store seeing the ad for the dirt cheap one from the no-name brand.
I totally understand the point as I just bought a new computer and thought I'd be paying $600 for a simple machine and ended up paying $1000 (and if my wife didn't say "enough", probably spend another $300).
But its good that there is at least that middle of the road option.
I agree that SSC had crept into the HT philosophy, it might be too late to turn back. I'll be off the joy ride if they make it all the way to those prices.