- Joined
- Oct 31, 2014
- Messages
- 13,003
- Reaction score
- 4,493
Yeah OK.......That wasn't the intent of his visit to Ben Solo's hut at all.
Sent from my LG-US996 using Tapatalk
Yeah OK.......That wasn't the intent of his visit to Ben Solo's hut at all.
Yeah OK.......
So you didn't actually watch the movie? Those screenshots don't depict what really happened in the hut.
I would really love to see the sales figures of this vs Hermit Luke. Are they still even making that version ? I mean it's a cool outfit etc. But it would be interesting to gauge the popularity or non-popularity of both these renditions of Luke.
On the other hand, the fact they are even making a Force Projecction figure says enough in itself.
I see you edited your post. Either way you are really splitting hairs.
Had a $50 voucher I had to use and it was a toss up between a second Royal Guard and this. Since I really like this Luke figure I decided on this. Now to year long wait with the occasional flex payment to break the monotony.
Also, can we get this -><- redone with lightsabres?
No, I simply understood the context of the scene. By your logic I could use ESB or ROTJ as examples of Luke Skywalker being an unheroic "attempted father killer." But context is everything and based on your choice of screenshots above it totally eluded you in the case of TLJ.
He entered the tent to get an uninterrupted mind read on the darkness that he sensed in his nephew while training him. What he was blown away by was visions of his other pupils being murdered and trillions of innocent people being wiped out. In ROTJ his father threatened one person which threw Luke into a prolonged murderous rage. In TLJ he saw trillions threatened and instinctively turned on his lightsaber for a split second but then regained his composure. I'd say he handled himself quite well, especially in comparison to his more youthful self.
...Don't waste your time arguing with dense people. It's a waste of time, energy and thought.
Without wanting to start a debate here, I still cannot fathom how anyone could think they could take a character as beloved and established in Popculture lore, and do that to them. It's just unbelievable. Take any other character and do your "forget the past" or "it's not going to work out the way you think" methodology and use it on someone else. But not Luke. That is suicide IMO.
That's either some massive kahunas right there or pure stupidity, however I fear the latter.
Feel free to PM if you ever need to get rid of a $50 voucher.
Here you go.
The film shows two different points of view of the same incident, Luke's perspective and Kylo's perspective.
In either case even if you choose to believe it was a temporary impulse TLJ Luke did in fact light his saber on his NEPHEW(context being everything, I'll reiterate this is the son of Leia and Han) while he slept based on the potential of a VISION, not an actual committed act. Doesn't seem like something Luke Skywalker would do to me.
Ignore, misread your comment.No it shows three perspectives, Luke's original telling, Kylo's telling, and Luke's revised retelling which is presented as the truth.
Context that you repeatedly ignore in order to justify posting erroneous memes. You're free to do so of course but your posts come across more as "TLJ Derangement Syndrome" than as presenting a valid critique of the film. I could just as easily play your game by saying that Obi-Wan did in fact light his saber on his BEST FRIEND that he TREATED LIKE A SON who had YET TO DO ANYTHING WRONG in ROTS when he instinctively lit his saber after Anakin surprised him by jumping into the elevator on Grievous' ship. Obviously that would be just as silly as what you're stating about TLJ Luke since I too would be ignoring the most important context of Obi-Wan's actions.
I get that TLJ was a mixed bag, and there were definitely things that I wish had been done differently with Luke (comedic saber toss for one) but I don't think that that's any excuse to willfully ignore the story as it actually presented.
No it shows three perspectives, Luke's original telling, Kylo's telling, and Luke's revised retelling which is presented as the truth.
Context that you repeatedly ignore in order to justify posting erroneous memes. You're free to do so of course but your posts come across more as "TLJ Derangement Syndrome" than as presenting a valid critique of the film. I could just as easily play your game by saying that Obi-Wan did in fact light his saber on his BEST FRIEND that he TREATED LIKE A SON who had YET TO DO ANYTHING WRONG in ROTS when he instinctively lit his saber after Anakin surprised him by jumping into the elevator on Grievous' ship. Obviously that would be just as silly as what you're stating about TLJ Luke since I too would be ignoring the most important context of Obi-Wan's actions.
I get that TLJ was a mixed bag, and there were definitely things that I wish had been done differently with Luke (comedic saber toss for one) but I don't think that that's any excuse to willfully ignore the story as it actually presented.
Don't waste your time arguing with dense people. It's a waste of time, energy and thought.
Enter your email address to join: