Surprise, surprise, another recaster thread filled with honey wagon posts from freaks with a false sense of entitlement.
Must be a slow figure month.
Surprise, surprise, surprise... it never takes long in these threads for some mo-mo to come with their "the artists are the real thieves" horse s__t theory and poison our eyes with some bull s__t justification on why they're selfish unscrupulous pricks.
I hope that wasn't directed at me. I am all for an artist being paid what the market will bear. I sell stuff all the time (I have to or I'd never get new stuff) and always try to get the best dollar value I can for my work.
My point was, and remains, the best way to keep someone from selling your stuff is to sell it yourself.
This board, while popular and gaining new members all the time, is a fairly insular community. Artists come here and we take them in. We feed them and try our best to keep them safe.
But there are several billion people on the planet who don't know anything about this forum. Some of those people collect figures. So they go to eBay to buy pieces for those figures. It is a shame that people come in her and steal heads and such to sell there but again they are proving there is a market for this stuff outside this comparatively small community.
Let's say, just as an example (someone can crap on it later), that I come up with a new recipe for lemonade. Best recipe ever. Delicious.
I put a stand on my front lawn and sell 20 glasses. One of the guys who buys it tells me he owns a grocery store chain and can put my lemonade in stores all over the country and sell it by the gallon. I tell him, "No thanks. I'll just sell 20 glasses a week from my front lawn."
Does that make any sense from a business perspective? Does that make any sense from a creative perspective where you want to get your hard work and artistry into the hands of as many people as possible who want to own it and appreciate it? I don't think so.
i thanked him for the link. as i wrote in response to the pm you sent me -- you have serious issues, sorry. good luck.
Who ever said that? The issue with your posts was about your beating a dead horse over and over, not insinuations that you weren't a real fan.And then im told that any "real fan" should be willing to pay however many hundreds of dollars it takes to earn the respect of the rest of the board.
Im the only one who wants to directly support Trevor but can't afford to piss away $200 on a freaking doll head just to support a studio full of painters whose services I don't require. And then im told that any "real fan" should be willing to pay however many hundreds of dollars it takes to earn the respect of the rest of the board.
Yea, im the one with issues.
Who ever said that? The issue with your posts was about your beating a dead horse over and over, not insinuations that you weren't a real fan.
Surprise, surprise, surprise... it never takes long in these threads for some mo-mo to come with their "the artists are the real thieves" horse s__t theory and poison our eyes with some bull s__t justification on why they're selfish unscrupulous pricks.
What ever happened to the "list" of members proving recasters, such a Q, head sculpts to recast? I know there's still some out there.(especially a petty particular someone)
My post was aimed at a certain group of freaks in particular who feel they're owed custom headsculpts because they missed out on the initial run and shouldn't have to pay the initial high-price, nor the secondary market value, and hence, justify going through the recaster.
Don't get me wrong, im not supporting recasts. And when I say this im not referring to you so much as the sentiment in general.
I just think it seems rather elitist to have the attitude that those who can't afford this sudden spike in prices should get left behind if they want to stay in good standing with the board. Seems to be an easy and unfair choice to make on behalf of someone else. Once again, not referring to you specifically.
Now this is a kind of discussion I would like to have, but knowing the forum as I do, I can say with reasonable certainty how it would go. . .and it would be far from interesting.there is no "right" to luxury items, unless you talk collective property and anarchism -- in which case i might be intrigued to hear how you'd want to realize it, because it's a great premise.
"la propriété, c'est le vol / property is theft" (pierre-joseph proudhon)
Enter your email address to join: