- Joined
- Jan 5, 2008
- Messages
- 35,160
- Reaction score
- 2
They made us believe them with their lies.
I can't believe some people are putting Predators 2010 after Predator Original or even worse before Predator 2. Predators was a complete rehash of the original Predator. It wasnt a continuation it felt like a remake. Same type of characters as the first....same jungle area...okay more preds but still man...no credit for being original ??? Even though Predator 2 wasn't everyones best film at least they did something original. This is like when Bryan Singer did Superman Returns and called it a continuation after the original Superman film when what it really was a homage after homage and a boring as hell script. In my opinion Predators feels like a big budget re hash of the original Predator and people are eatin it up....
I do not understand how someone can watch AVP then AVPR and think that AVP was better. I know it's basically like choosing between two pieces of crap but I really thought AVPR had awesome designs, was fresh enough (it didn't try to copy the previous films), and of course, had lots of cool killings. I can't sit through AVP. Boring characters, horrible script/acting, wonky story. That said, Predators is becoming overrated and Predator will always be tops.
The Predalien was worse then Scar's face...the single worst creature design in the franchise's history.
And AvP-R's characters were more out of character. The Aliens did jack ____, and the Predator was poorly equipped.
Poorly equipped? Please elaborate how Wolf is poorly equipped.
I think i may start a thread called no haters allowed, Just fans of all 5 predators post.
lol, why you getting so mad if people don't like this movie?
I haven't seen it yet, looks too much like a rehash of Predator, with a few more Predators. . .
You summed it up Evil. Most of the movie is just a ripoff of the original.lol, why you getting so mad if people don't like this movie?
I haven't seen it yet, looks too much like a rehash of Predator, with a few more Predators. . .