What's going on in the ab area there. Looks weird.
There's a strap from his vest and hole in the navel, but I think all HT muscle bodies have a hole in the navel.
What's going on in the ab area there. Looks weird.
There's a strap from his vest and hole in the navel, but I think all HT muscle bodies have a hole in the navel.
heh, yeah. i can b1tch about my elder p2 on here. even though it's still my favorite 1/6th figure.I can afford both so....whatevah. They still screwed up the blades. But that seriously will NOT stop me from buying it. FIGURE OF 2009!!!!!
heh, yeah. i can b1tch about my elder p2 on here. even though it's still my favorite 1/6th figure.
complaining about accuracy has nothing to do with whether or not i can afford something.
i complained about the aliens marines even when they were $60. i still think they're just awful.
First post here, been reading up on a few things for the last month or so. Wanted to comment on this discussion. Technically, while it would be movie accurate to include the rods underneath, that's actually a bit of the mechanics used to extend them by Stan Winston and not a feature shown in other forms of Predator media like games, comics etc. What you're seeing are the air cylinders used by the crew to extend the blades. That was the only way of doing it without sacrificing the look of them. Hell, in most of the movie, they aren't even present as the static unit is used. And it would be impossible to have them on there when the blades trap Dutch's head on the log.Ya know...for once...I'm going to have to agree with you.
What the hell?!?! How'd they get the blades wrong?
What he means is, the blades are missing the strip of metal that runs under both of them. You see this when they're fully extended.
And they're definately not as curved in the movie as they are on the HT fig.
The Cinemaquette Pred got it pretty close to accurate (last pic).
just trying to figure out what to get now Predator diorama or dutch or the 1/6 predator
Ya know...for once...I'm going to have to agree with you.
What the hell?!?! How'd they get the blades wrong?
What he means is, the blades are missing the strip of metal that runs under both of them. You see this when they're fully extended.
And they're definately not as curved in the movie as they are on the HT fig.
The Cinemaquette Pred got it pretty close to accurate (last pic).
First post here, been reading up on a few things for the last month or so. Wanted to comment on this discussion. Technically, while it would be movie accurate to include the rods underneath, that's actually a bit of the mechanics used to extend them by Stan Winston and not a feature shown in other forms of Predator media like games, comics etc. What you're seeing are the air cylinders used by the crew to extend the blades. That was the only way of doing it without sacrificing the look of them. Hell, in most of the movie, they aren't even present as the static unit is used. And it would be impossible to have them on there when the blades trap Dutch's head on the log.
Honestly I think it's more accurate to leave them off the figure myself.
I sure hope this new body means RAMBO is coming in 2009.
anybody have a screen cap lying around?
First post here, been reading up on a few things for the last month or so. Wanted to comment on this discussion. Technically, while it would be movie accurate to include the rods underneath, that's actually a bit of the mechanics used to extend them by Stan Winston and not a feature shown in other forms of Predator media like games, comics etc. What you're seeing are the air cylinders used by the crew to extend the blades. That was the only way of doing it without sacrificing the look of them. Hell, in most of the movie, they aren't even present as the static unit is used. And it would be impossible to have them on there when the blades trap Dutch's head on the log.
Honestly I think it's more accurate to leave them off the figure myself.
Enter your email address to join: