intothevoid
Super Freak
How is it even a question. It's self evident.
Evidently not so self evident for many
How is it even a question. It's self evident.
Evidently not so self evident for many
The only thing self-evident is that all men are created equal... anything else can GTFO. A little bit of Declaration of Independence knowledge to piss off the Brits in here.
All men are created equal indeed. And the deceleration of independence has nothing to do with that.
(Don't consider myself a Brit )
Touché void, and good job on the opening ceremonies of the Olympics.
That's what I was trying to say in my original post, but Bucky Underbelly said it's an all-inclusive licensing deal by the studio and not individual licenses to the actors.
I figured that's why the 10th Anniversary set had Scarecrow with no Cillian Murphy sculpt and Bat-Demon instead of Ra's. No likenesses to pay for at all.
Wow. Hot Toys actually found a even more boring figure to make than that Coulson guy.
HOW DARE YOU!? That man is 4 movies! That alone makes him more deserving than Ra's Al Ghul.
Looks cool enough ...
... complete misinterpretation of the ending, though. He was already 'Robin'. That's why they didn't name him "Richard Grayson" -- to be clear that he wasn't becoming Robin after the movie. He was Robin throughout TDKR.
He's taking over as Batman (because Batman can be anyone), he's not graduating from Robin to Nightwing. It wouldn't make any sense for him to become a different superhero when part of the point of the movie was that Batman isn't only Bruce Wayne -- he's a symbol that can be everlasting. The end of TDKR is more of a Batman Beyond or 'Death of Bruce Wayne' (comic storyline) ending than a Nightwing or Robin ending. It isn't about a sidekick or successor to Batman ... it is about a new Batman.
Only way I see it making sense for Blake to ever become Nightwing is if and when Bruce comes back to Gotham and becomes Batman again.
SnakeDoc
Looks cool enough ...
... complete misinterpretation of the ending, though. He was already 'Robin'. That's why they didn't name him "Richard Grayson" -- to be clear that he wasn't becoming Robin after the movie. He was Robin throughout TDKR.
He's taking over as Batman (because Batman can be anyone), he's not graduating from Robin to Nightwing. It wouldn't make any sense for him to become a different superhero when part of the point of the movie was that Batman isn't only Bruce Wayne -- he's a symbol that can be everlasting. The end of TDKR is more of a Batman Beyond or 'Death of Bruce Wayne' (comic storyline) ending than a Nightwing or Robin ending. It isn't about a sidekick or successor to Batman ... it is about a new Batman.
Only way I see it making sense for Blake to ever become Nightwing is if and when Bruce comes back to Gotham and becomes Batman again.
SnakeDoc
Enter your email address to join: