InArt - The Batman 1/6th Figure

Collector Freaks Forum

Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Does improve it if you get rid of the volume on the hair.

a inart trimmed hair tt-horz.jpg
 
I'm getting roasted on Facebook, lol

But I think to get the point BLEAH and I are trying to get across, we need to get a look at the Inart sculpt from a similar angle to this picture.

It'll have a much rounder, uniform shape by comparison. Sculpt looks excellent from the front. But it's supposed to taper as you rotate the head away from its central axis.
20240411_212743.jpg
 
I love how this thread went for pure negative to positive. Both inart and hot toys are both incredibly strong figures, I wish I art had included the angry mouth piece.
It's because several people who write in this thread are absolutely insane. Overreact to everything. Don't understand how lens and perspective changes effect photographs. You can set your watch to it- this is the typical flow of most releases. Overreactions about the eye color, uninformed statements about the sculpts changing even though it was confirmed by the manufacturer that they didn't, etc. You could shrink the real robert pattinson down to 1/6 scale and post photos of it and someone on here would talk about how his chin needed to be angled differently. Basically just stereotypical annoying nerd behavior.
 
I'm getting roasted on Facebook, lol

But I think to get the point BLEAH and I are trying to get across, we need to get a look at the Inart sculpt from a similar angle to this picture.

It'll have a much rounder, uniform shape by comparison. Sculpt looks excellent from the front. But it's supposed to taper as you rotate the head away from its central axis.View attachment 697592
Eh, going off of that reference, I'd say they have it pretty close. I do see issues with the cowl and mouth plate but I don't think the edit posted earlier was any better. If anything it stylized it the opposite direction to an idealized version of Pattinson.

fEEqWWc.png
 
I'm getting roasted on Facebook, lol

But I think to get the point BLEAH and I are trying to get across, we need to get a look at the Inart sculpt from a similar angle to this picture.

It'll have a much rounder, uniform shape by comparison. Sculpt looks excellent from the front. But it's supposed to taper as you rotate the head away from its central axis.View attachment 697592


I think I'll wait for more photos and in-hand experience. I'm looking at the unmasked sculpts and the BW one and from the 3/4-ish view far away profile shots, I can see that taper on the jaw.

I would say this photo made me laugh because it reminded me of all the complaints on the bottom of the nose showing up beyond the mask. I went back to check the new photos and it has been fixed. 🤣
 
I'm assuming both Jedha and Justin will have received the rooted version and probably not also the sculpted hair version to compare? Right now I'm not loving the rooted hair but need to see both clearer.
 
It's because several people who write in this thread are absolutely insane. Overreact to everything. Don't understand how lens and perspective changes effect photographs. You can set your watch to it- this is the typical flow of most releases. Overreactions about the eye color, uninformed statements about the sculpts changing even though it was confirmed by the manufacturer that they didn't, etc. You could shrink the real robert pattinson down to 1/6 scale and post photos of it and someone on here would talk about how his chin needed to be angled differently. Basically just stereotypical annoying nerd behavior.
Do you understand why this forum is for? To discuss. People can say what they think. The sculpt looks good as of now but surely it’s changed and they have changed the eyes also to blue and not reverted back to the original eye colour in the proto🙂
 
Back
Top