Yup I noticed bro. But any idea what's this?
View attachment 697588
The HT also has one black thing to hold the face plate. Probably for magnetic purpose broYup I noticed bro. But any idea what's this?
View attachment 697588
Ah ok. Thanks bud!Doesn’t look like the faceplate has been pushed in enough.
I see. Thanks broThe HT also has one black thing to hold the face plate. Probably for magnetic purpose bro
Do you think that happened once again after the Wonder Festival?Doesn’t look like the faceplate has been pushed in enough.
It's because several people who write in this thread are absolutely insane. Overreact to everything. Don't understand how lens and perspective changes effect photographs. You can set your watch to it- this is the typical flow of most releases. Overreactions about the eye color, uninformed statements about the sculpts changing even though it was confirmed by the manufacturer that they didn't, etc. You could shrink the real robert pattinson down to 1/6 scale and post photos of it and someone on here would talk about how his chin needed to be angled differently. Basically just stereotypical annoying nerd behavior.I love how this thread went for pure negative to positive. Both inart and hot toys are both incredibly strong figures, I wish I art had included the angry mouth piece.
Eh, going off of that reference, I'd say they have it pretty close. I do see issues with the cowl and mouth plate but I don't think the edit posted earlier was any better. If anything it stylized it the opposite direction to an idealized version of Pattinson.I'm getting roasted on Facebook, lol
But I think to get the point BLEAH and I are trying to get across, we need to get a look at the Inart sculpt from a similar angle to this picture.
It'll have a much rounder, uniform shape by comparison. Sculpt looks excellent from the front. But it's supposed to taper as you rotate the head away from its central axis.View attachment 697592
I'm getting roasted on Facebook, lol
But I think to get the point BLEAH and I are trying to get across, we need to get a look at the Inart sculpt from a similar angle to this picture.
It'll have a much rounder, uniform shape by comparison. Sculpt looks excellent from the front. But it's supposed to taper as you rotate the head away from its central axis.View attachment 697592
View attachment 697576I'm assuming both Jedha and Justin will have received the rooted version and probably not also the sculpted hair version to compare? Right now I'm not loving the rooted hair but need to see both clearer.
Oh I missed. thanks
Do you understand why this forum is for? To discuss. People can say what they think. The sculpt looks good as of now but surely it’s changed and they have changed the eyes also to blue and not reverted back to the original eye colour in the protoIt's because several people who write in this thread are absolutely insane. Overreact to everything. Don't understand how lens and perspective changes effect photographs. You can set your watch to it- this is the typical flow of most releases. Overreactions about the eye color, uninformed statements about the sculpts changing even though it was confirmed by the manufacturer that they didn't, etc. You could shrink the real robert pattinson down to 1/6 scale and post photos of it and someone on here would talk about how his chin needed to be angled differently. Basically just stereotypical annoying nerd behavior.
I noticed that too, it looks like the body is the same this whole time and we all assumed wrong from bad photos again.Is it me or the proportions look like the prototype which is thin and not bulky like the factory production one?
Enter your email address to join: